Sunday, May 24, 2015

Poltergeist review: The only thing scary is that they made such a mess of this ...



By Aditya Kundalkar

Horror movies have a way of tapping into your biggest fears. Shadows. Clowns. Flickering TV screens. But heres a helpful spoiler alert: You can watch all the scariest bits of the new Poltergeist on YouTube.

You dont need a review to ruin Poltergeist for you. The filmmakers have done it themselves. And it wouldnt hurt as much if their names werent producer Sam Raimi (Evil Dead, Oz the Great and Powerful), director Gil Kenan (Monster House) and David Lindsay-Abaire (Rabbit Hole, Inkheart). Individually, theyve done some good work, but the team effort hasnt quite worked.

Even if the story isnt new, the real joy or in this case, the real horror lies in the telling. Every good yarn has to have a build-up that eventually leads to the big reveal, even if it is a remake of a story that everyone already knows. The trouble with this new Poltergeist is that the big reveal comes too soon, much before the halfway mark.

Wheres the slow burn? Why didnt you let me even try to figure it out by myself first? And now whats the point of the rest of the film? Its just a light-and-sound show that says, Look at what my CGI team can do!

Sure the special effects are slicker than the original and suitably terrifying. For instance, gone is the 21-inch CRT television set, replaced by a big, hi-definition flat screen. Not only does this mean more PPI (pixels-per-inch) but also more PPI (palms-per-inch).

Other modern trappings like iPhones and drones become carriers and deliverers of clingy, spooky stuff. But somehow, its all far less horrific than the melted-cheese-and-ketchup variety of special FX in the 1982 original.

So while in 2015 we get a deftly woven, undulating, wall-to-wall corpse carpet (#win), we only get a few seconds of black, maggoty vomit (#fail). Considering the quantity and the quality of gore thats become par for the course these days, #WhatAreYouAfraidOf Mr Filmmakers?

There are parts of the film that made us feel they should have just gone and made a spoof. As it is, the ghost hunters reality show hashtag (#thishouseisclean) feels more like a comical parody of this iconic moment than a modern-day update of that classic line. Or maybe weve come to expect only spoofs because of Ace Ventura, Family Guy, and this French flick.

Through it all, we were glad that Poltergeist 2015 is a whole 20 minutes shorter than the original. In hindsight, though, maybe they should have kept those 20 minutes and spent them doing what the original does so well: build up not only the tension, but also each character so that we feel something for them.

For instance, in 1982, the little girl has a bird that dies. She stops her mother from flushing it down the toilet and insists on giving the dead bird a proper burial, which ties in nicely with the whole cemetery theme. In 2015, all we know is she has a favourite stuffed toy, prefers pizza for breakfast, and echoes her siblings choicest insults. What does she feel about birds and animals? And does she notice the dead flowers in the lawn?

Its the same for the little boy. In 1982, we saw his roller skates, Star Wars bedspread and Chewbacca jacket and in a matter of seconds, we knew enough about him to care. In 2015, we see the boy playing an iPad game and although were shown he owns big boxes of comic books, were never shown which titles. Is he a Marvel fan or dedicated to DC? Superman or Wonderwoman? Why should we care about this kid?

To be fair, there is one scene in this movie thats been successfully updated for the 21st century. The little girls disappeared and the parents are struggling with the decision of calling the police. Their reasons for deciding not to are probably the scariest thing in this movie because those reasons are very real, not supernatural.

And therein lies the worst rub, as far as the horror element in Poltergeist is concerned. The real scares come from reality at its least supernatural. If you enjoy watching the kind of torture p**n that shows people suffering the shock and horror of cancelled credit cards, the terror of discovering your new neighbourhood has no malls, and the claustrophobia of trite and awkward dinner conversations this ones for you.

Source: http://www.firstpost.com/bollywood/poltergeist-review-thing-scary-made-mess-remake-2259276.html



Continue Reading ..

This Blackhawks dad and son are exhausted by overtime playoff hockey



Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot username?

We'll email it to you.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Try another email? Forgot username?

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Try another email? Join SBNation.com

You must be a member of SBNation.com to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SBNation.com. You should read them.

Join SBNation.com

You must be a member of SBNation.com to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SBNation.com. You should read them.

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

Source: http://www.sbnation.com/lookit/2015/5/24/8651939/this-blackhawks-dad-and-son-are-exhausted-by-overtime-playoff-hockey



Continue Reading ..

Warriors' Deep Reserve of Veterans Setting Stage for Stephen Curry's Heroics



It wound up feeling like Stephen Curry had done it again, pounding people into submission the way only he can do it with his feathers and cotton b***s.

Yet long before Curry stole the show Saturday night in Houston and finished with 40 pointsscoring system: perfect 10s for artistry, efficiency, showmanship and historical valuethe Golden State Warriors had control of the game and the Western Conference Finals because of his teammates.

As the Warriors savor their 115-80 victory and 3-0 series lead on the Houston Rockets, let's pause to recognize that Golden State's beautiful game isn't just Curry's beautiful game, or the Splash Brothers' sweet shooting, or the rookie runner-up Coach of the Year's sunny disposition.

This is a great team, one that should be heavily favored in the soon-to-be NBA Finals even as LeBron James has the Cleveland Cavaliers cresting in the East.

When you rewind into basketball history, you don't often see occasionally excellent guys such as J.R. Smith or Josh Smith as supporting pillars on championship teams.

You see role players such as Andrew Bogut, Andre Iguodala and Shaun Livingstonplayers who have had their previous highs also but have settled into jobs that they know they can do and are truly happy to do on a nightly basis.

They were all key in Golden State's powerful start Saturday night, way before Curry floored the Rockets. And guys like Bogut, Iguodala and Livingston are the reason we invariably see proven players (or over-the-hill former stars) hopping on championship-or-bust trains: It just makes sense that they can provide talent-rich teams with stability and professionalism.

The Warriors also happen to have the luxury of Curry's greatness, the scoring and defense of Klay Thompson, the explosiveness of Harrison Barnes and the consummate role player in today's NBA, Draymond Green.

Green is so fantastically good at his plethora of jobs that he should command a max-value contract in restricted free agency this summer. All credit to Green, not just for his defensive tenacity and ability to guard either James Harden or Dwight Howard, but he's a key playmaker who is often the trigger for Golden State's offense finding better shots or delving deeper into its sets after the initial action has failed.

But the likes of Green, Thompson, Barnes (as well as useful backup center Festus Ezeli, injured designated scorer Marreese Speights and unneeded but talented swingman Justin Holiday) are a different kind of role player. They are all still on the rise. Yet they have not fully seen and lived the NBA wars and appreciate the simple value of staying in your lane until there is a void you should fill.

Rarely does the individual attention go to the veteran role players who are willing to do the dirty work.

Bogut's screen-setting and passing are underrated cogs in the offensive machinery, but at least he gets some love (as seen in his All-Defensive second-team selection) as Golden State's valuable rim-protector.

Iguodala is one of the rare players in this league who have pretty much every tool. Despite that, his usage is so low that he was useless in all but the deepest of fantasy basketball leagues this season with 7.8 points per game. That's just not enough scoring glory to impress the simple-minded voters for NBA Sixth Man of the Year, no matter Iguodala's value as a defender and passer.

Livingston turns 30 this year, a long way from the phenom touted to be the next Magic Johnson and infamous for the 2007 knee injury when he heard the word "amputation" in the hospital. He has bounced around the league and bounced back to form a new, steadier identity that the Warriors valued in making him their key free-agent acquisition, committing to him for three years.

Saturday night showed the value in having those types of veterans on the roster.

Despite where he finished the game, Curry actually started the pivotal second quarter Saturday night on the benchand then missed his first two shots, a step-back three-pointer and a driving finger roll in beginning the game 1-of-4 from the field. When Curry got a driving finger roll to fall midway through the second quarter, the Warriors didn't take the lead or begin a comeback.

They simply boosted their lead to 11 points.

They had already received 10 first-quarter points from Bogut. Then timely post-up buckets from Livingston. Iguodala roared in for a dunk and a layup on consecutive possessions, besides throwing a perfect alley-oop pass. Soon enough, he was taking outstanding defensive turns against Harden.

The Warriors led by 12 points after that first quarter. Curry had three points and two assists; he wasn't defending anyone of consequence, either.

The group dynamic was what was working for the Warriors. Then Curry's feathers and cotton b***s fanned the flame to roar out of control.

And Golden State has more veteran production in reserve. There's Leandro Barbosa, whom Steve Kerr will readily tell you is the one guy on the team with deep playoff experience from his days in Phoenix, making plays often enough that the "beep-beep" Road Runner sound effect is regularly played in the arena for him.

And don't forgetDavid Lee, the Warriors' highest-paid player who just two years ago became the team's first All-Star in 16 years. If there's anyone who could be the squeaky wheel, it's the little-used Lee, who capped the Warriors pre-halftime barrage with a nifty layup but otherwise only saw the court for the last 3:31 of the game.

Of course, it's easy to say now that these guys should obviously be buying in because the Warriors are on the cusp of the NBA championship.

That's unfair. The Warriors are on the cusp because these guys bought in.

It's a team game played by individuals.

Sometimes, Curry looks heaven-sent, yes.

Most times, it's just a team game, and that's a credit to all the Warriors.

Kevin Ding covers the NBA for Bleacher Report. Follow him on Twitter@KevinDing.

Source: http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2474676-warriors-deep-reserve-of-veterans-setting-stage-for-stephen-currys-heroics



Continue Reading ..

How is Klay Thompson guarding James Harden?



Ethan Sherwood Strauss, ESPN Staff Writer

Close
  • Covers the Golden State Warriors for ESPN.com
  • Contributes to ESPN's TrueHoop blog
  • Hosts TrueHoop TV Live

Is Klay Thompson doing a bad job guarding James Harden?

Whats clear is that he has done an ineffective job so far, which isnt necessarily the same as doing a bad one. Were looking at a two-game sample size, where offense can triumph over good defense in a way that might not sustain in the long haul. Still, this is staggering production from Harden: 33 points on 20.5 shots, with 10.5 rebounds and 9 assists.

Before getting to the Thompson-on-Harden aspect, I want to address all those assists the Beard has reaped. His passing has been a testament to perceptiveness and adaptability. The Warriors are forcing him to pass differently than he usually does, and hes thriving despite it.

Hardens tendency in pick-and-roll situations is to kick it out to shooters. This season, 257 of his passes led directly to 3-point makes. The Warriors have countered this tendency by refusing to drift off the 3-point line. Last series, Jamal Crawford undermined the Clippers' efforts to quell the Rockets 3-point barrage by massively helping off the weak side, leaving guys open in the corner. Golden States players have been extreme in the other direction. When Harden drives, Warriors guards arent crashing down to stop his path, instead daring him to make plays in the paint.

Keep track of every NBA playoff seriesall postseason long. NBA playoffs '15

Harden has responded with absolutely brilliant interior passing. His last assist was probably his best: A sailing lob to Dwight Howard that eluded Andrew Boguts grasp like a soccer goal that chips the keeper. In these two games, only one of Hardens passes has resulted in a 3-point make. Those other 17 assists have all been for 2s, many of them close to the hoop. If you told me Houston hits 15 total 3s in the opening two road games, Id assume disaster. Theyve actually done quite well offensively.

There is another component to the Rockets success on offense, and its related to the Thompson-Harden faceoff: Hardens killing it from midrange, as Zach Lowe noted on Grantland. Not only has Harden shot 60 percent on long 2s (he shot 35 percent on such attempts this season), but hes doing it in a roundabout way: Hardens dribbling the leather off the ball.

Just as long 2s are inefficient shots that Harden has made efficient in this series, so, too, are shots taken after many dribbles. For the vast majority of players (i.e., everyone but Stephen Curry), dribbling a lot before your windup usually means shooting off-balance, contested, with tired legs. Its just bad for marksmanship. Theres a reason William Tell didnt jog around and do a massive backward leap before letting the arrow fly.

In this series, Hardens doing the equivalent of splitting the apple while doing backflips. Its a stark contrast from the season, where, according to NBA.com player tracking, Harden managed an effective field goal mark of 46.6 percent on shots taken after seven or more dribbles. In this series, hes at a 72.2 percent eFG on such shots. Also, these shots account for 44 percent of Hardens attempts. Overall, the Warriors are getting the holy grail of shots you want Harden taking: long 2s after many, many dribbles. And overall, Harden is absolutely torching them on such shots. He already has made one midrange jumper more than he did in the entire seven-game Clippers series.

After Game 2, Thompson said: "I don't let made or missed shots dictate how I play defense as long as I'm in his body and making him take tough shots." There might be something to that. After going through the video, I would say that Thompson isnt doing a bad job, but he is doing a flawed job. Thompson is doing Thompson things, doggedly fighting around screens and chasing Harden with full effort. The issue is that effort can be its own trap against a languid performer like the Beard (See: Thompson fouling Harden on the first possession of Game 2).

Theres a jiu-jitsu to Harden. Defenders are trained to leverage their strengths, and Harden uses that against his opponents. He interprets size and length as merely a bigger strike zone for drawing contact. Aggressive defense gets faked into aggressively pursuing nothing or into fouling its focus.

This is why J.J. Redick did such a counterintuitively good job on Harden last series. Redick isnt long and isnt experienced in pressuring the ball. So, he positioned himself in front of his mark, gave Harden some room and stayed keyed on where his torso moved. When Harden attempted to draw contact, Redick whipped his hands up and away, like he was playing b****y knuckles.

In contrast, Thompson tries to stay glued to Hardens jersey, leaving him vulnerable to fakes and push-offs. Defensively, less might be more for Thompson (note: Id imagine that its much easier to dispense advice on guarding Harden than it is to actually do it).

Can Thompson do better? Sure, but Im not exactly sold on Harden maintaining this shooting stretch. I also think its worth it for Golden State to continue to defend this way, generally. Take out Houstons shooters and force Harden to be a one-man offense. Ive seen suggestions to double-team Harden, which I believe to be a generally bad move. You dont want to create 4-on-3 situations when the other team has Howard, ready to flush the lobs that result.

If there is an adjustment to make, its probably letting one of Golden States many other wings try their luck as the primary defender (Andre Iguodala is the best candidate). I dont think thats necessary -- yet. Thompson has gotten torched by Harden and Thompson has made mistakes guarding Harden. He also has not allowed Harden an easy path to this fantastic run. If the Beard keeps draining midrange shots after dribbling the clock out, Golden State has to live with the results. That much is true regardless of the job Thompson's doing.

Source: http://espn.go.com/blog/golden-state-warriors/post/_/id/626/how-is-klay-thompson-guarding-james-harden



Continue Reading ..

Saturday, May 23, 2015

How is Klay Thompson guarding James Harden?



Ethan Sherwood Strauss, ESPN Staff Writer

Close
  • Covers the Golden State Warriors for ESPN.com
  • Contributes to ESPN's TrueHoop blog
  • Hosts TrueHoop TV Live

Is Klay Thompson doing a bad job guarding James Harden?

Whats clear is that he has done an ineffective job so far, which isnt necessarily the same as doing a bad one. Were looking at a two-game sample size, where offense can triumph over good defense in a way that might not sustain in the long haul. Still, this is staggering production from Harden: 33 points on 20.5 shots, with 10.5 rebounds and 9 assists.

Before getting to the Thompson-on-Harden aspect, I want to address all those assists the Beard has reaped. His passing has been a testament to perceptiveness and adaptability. The Warriors are forcing him to pass differently than he usually does, and hes thriving despite it.

Hardens tendency in pick-and-roll situations is to kick it out to shooters. This season, 257 of his passes led directly to 3-point makes. The Warriors have countered this tendency by refusing to drift off the 3-point line. Last series, Jamal Crawford undermined the Clippers' efforts to quell the Rockets 3-point barrage by massively helping off the weak side, leaving guys open in the corner. Golden States players have been extreme in the other direction. When Harden drives, Warriors guards arent crashing down to stop his path, instead daring him to make plays in the paint.

Keep track of every NBA playoff seriesall postseason long. NBA playoffs '15

Harden has responded with absolutely brilliant interior passing. His last assist was probably his best: A sailing lob to Dwight Howard that eluded Andrew Boguts grasp like a soccer goal that chips the keeper. In these two games, only one of Hardens passes has resulted in a 3-point make. Those other 17 assists have all been for 2s, many of them close to the hoop. If you told me Houston hits 15 total 3s in the opening two road games, Id assume disaster. Theyve actually done quite well offensively.

There is another component to the Rockets success on offense, and its related to the Thompson-Harden faceoff: Hardens killing it from midrange, as Zach Lowe noted on Grantland. Not only has Harden shot 60 percent on long 2s (he shot 35 percent on such attempts this season), but hes doing it in a roundabout way: Hardens dribbling the leather off the ball.

Just as long 2s are inefficient shots that Harden has made efficient in this series, so, too, are shots taken after many dribbles. For the vast majority of players (i.e., everyone but Stephen Curry), dribbling a lot before your windup usually means shooting off-balance, contested, with tired legs. Its just bad for marksmanship. Theres a reason William Tell didnt jog around and do a massive backward leap before letting the arrow fly.

In this series, Hardens doing the equivalent of splitting the apple while doing backflips. Its a stark contrast from the season, where, according to NBA.com player tracking, Harden managed an effective field goal mark of 46.6 percent on shots taken after seven or more dribbles. In this series, hes at a 72.2 percent eFG on such shots. Also, these shots account for 44 percent of Hardens attempts. Overall, the Warriors are getting the holy grail of shots you want Harden taking: long 2s after many, many dribbles. And overall, Harden is absolutely torching them on such shots. He already has made one midrange jumper more than he did in the entire seven-game Clippers series.

After Game 2, Thompson said: "I don't let made or missed shots dictate how I play defense as long as I'm in his body and making him take tough shots." There might be something to that. After going through the video, I would say that Thompson isnt doing a bad job, but he is doing a flawed job. Thompson is doing Thompson things, doggedly fighting around screens and chasing Harden with full effort. The issue is that effort can be its own trap against a languid performer like the Beard (See: Thompson fouling Harden on the first possession of Game 2).

Theres a jiu-jitsu to Harden. Defenders are trained to leverage their strengths, and Harden uses that against his opponents. He interprets size and length as merely a bigger strike zone for drawing contact. Aggressive defense gets faked into aggressively pursuing nothing or into fouling its focus.

This is why J.J. Redick did such a counterintuitively good job on Harden last series. Redick isnt long and isnt experienced in pressuring the ball. So, he positioned himself in front of his mark, gave Harden some room and stayed keyed on where his torso moved. When Harden attempted to draw contact, Redick whipped his hands up and away, like he was playing b****y knuckles.

In contrast, Thompson tries to stay glued to Hardens jersey, leaving him vulnerable to fakes and push-offs. Defensively, less might be more for Thompson (note: Id imagine that its much easier to dispense advice on guarding Harden than it is to actually do it).

Can Thompson do better? Sure, but Im not exactly sold on Harden maintaining this shooting stretch. I also think its worth it for Golden State to continue to defend this way, generally. Take out Houstons shooters and force Harden to be a one-man offense. Ive seen suggestions to double-team Harden, which I believe to be a generally bad move. You dont want to create 4-on-3 situations when the other team has Howard, ready to flush the lobs that result.

If there is an adjustment to make, its probably letting one of Golden States many other wings try their luck as the primary defender (Andre Iguodala is the best candidate). I dont think thats necessary -- yet. Thompson has gotten torched by Harden and Thompson has made mistakes guarding Harden. He also has not allowed Harden an easy path to this fantastic run. If the Beard keeps draining midrange shots after dribbling the clock out, Golden State has to live with the results. That much is true regardless of the job Thompson's doing.

Source: http://espn.go.com/blog/golden-state-warriors/post/_/id/626/how-is-klay-thompson-guarding-james-harden



Continue Reading ..

Conan O'Brien gives heartfelt farewell to David Letterman (Video)



Conan OBrien gave a send off to late night legend David Letterman forhis last show which aired the same time as Conan.

Conan OBrien took some time out of his monologue to address the elephant in the room: that there were probably no one watchingConanthat nightand those who were should definitely be watching Lettermans last show.

In a heartfelt message to his mentor, OBrien addressed his crowd, diverging from his normal monologue of jokes, to give a touching send off to Letterman. In it, he addressed Lettermans impact on comedy and the state of Conans career as he knows it.

Check it out below.

Conan explains in detail how rough the beginning years of is talk show hosting career was, even revealing that he was in danger of being cancelled.

Way back in 1993, I took over David Lettermans iconic late-night television show. I was a complete unknown with absolutely no experience performing on television. I was utterly and totally unprepared for that enormous job.

I got the s**t kicked out me. Critics despised me, the ratings were bad, my skin broke out.

Just when he thought he was done for good though, Letterman stepped in and changed things.

And then something miraculous happened: After four really dreary months, out of the blue, we got a message at the show that David Letterman wanted to come on the program as a guest.

Dave wasnt just the biggest star on late-night at the time, he was the biggest thing on television. He didnt go on other peoples shows. It was like the Beatles asking Maury Povich if they could stop by and sing a couple of tunes. It was that absurd.

He later revealed that Letterman blew the doors off the place.

Of course, this gave OBrien and his staff their second wind and they came out of it like gangbusters.

OBrien and his guest Patton Oswalt would later go on to tell his viewers to switch over to Lettermans show as soon as it hit its start time.

Just goes to show you, even in the world of late night television, theres still plenty of class to be had.

Source: http://fansided.com/2015/05/22/conan-obrien-gives-heartfelt-farewell-david-letterman-video/



Continue Reading ..

Friday, May 22, 2015

'Lip Sync Battle': Derek Hough Vs. Julianne Hough (Video)



Thursday nights Lip Sync Battle, kept it all in the family, as Derek Hough battled little sis, Julianne Hough. Both professional dancers, the brother and sister are also on Dancing With The Stars together.

At first I was like, Well I know Dancing With The Stars is popular, even though I love So You Think You Can Dance way more so eh. But I should have known that professional dancers, used to choreographing spectacular productions with less than professional dancers, would put on a show.

Watch the videos below.

And what a production it was!

Derek Houghs 1st song was a song his mother used to sing to him as a child, Macklemores Cant Hold Us. And he kept up with the fast lyrics! His movements are crisp, natural in a dancer. His face is intense through the entire song, and he drops to the ground at the end.

Color Commentator Chrissy Teigen: Someone rehearsed.Host LL Cool J: Move over, Ryan Lewis. How do you think you did?D. Hough: Um. Perfect.

Julianne Houghs 1st song was All About That Bass by Meghan Trainor. I knew what her strategy was before she said it to make her brother as uncomfortable as possible. She writhed and gyrated all over that stage, and then

She brought out a special guest.

D. Hough: It was wildly inappropriate.

Derek Houghs Cant Hold Us vs. Julianne Houghs All About That Bass | Lip Sync Battle

We have a sibling rivalry this week with Derek Hough and Julianne Hough. Derek Hough starts the battle out with Cant Hold Us by Macklemore & Ryan Lewis feat. Ray Dalton. Julianne Hough appropriately comes back with her own performance of All About That Bass by Meghan Trainor.

D. Hough comes out during the props and backup dancer portion wearing white and a Sia wig to perform Chandelier. He and his dancers look like they are doing a group contemporary production on SYTYCD, and it was fantastic. The lip syncing part was completely passionate. J. Hough declared, Hes never living this down. Ah siblings!

Oh. My. G*d. J. Hough came out with 2 shirtless and very fit male dancers, who were not above humping the floor to I Just Had s*x by Lonely Island. Her brother covered his face, especially during the I did it with my p***s line. She crawled on the floor. She twerked. She rubbed up on a dancer. Im pretty sure a dancer licked up her leg. She was ALL IN.

Julianne Houghs I Just Had s*x vs. Derek Houghs Chandelier | Lip Sync Battle

The sibling rivalry continues with Derek Hough performing a dazzling rendition of Chandelier by Sia. Julianne Hough brings the battle to a traumatizing close with I Just Had s*x by The Lonely Island.

And the winner is

Julianne Hough on her Lip Sync Win

Julianne Hough brought the heat and traumatized her older brother, Derek Hough. What did Julianne think of her win?

Do you agree with the results?

Source: http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2015/05/15/lip-sync-battle-derek-hough-vs-julianne-hough-video



Continue Reading ..