Sunday, March 12, 2017

Jack"s Back: The Best Episodes of SAMURAI JACK


Samurai Jack - Season 5 Episode 1 Part 1

Take one part Akira Kurosawa, one part Sergio Leone, a dash of futuristic sci-fi, and blend it all together under the creative eye of one the best animators of our time. Thats your recipe for SAMURAI JACK. Created by animator Genndy Tartakovsky in 2001, SAMURAI JACK looks and feels to this day unlike anything in western animation. The series ran until 2004 and in that time the show put its title character through a series of increasingly impossible challenges in his desperate attempt to return to the past and defeat the evil wizard Aku who ravaged his homeland and conquered the world.

Every episode of SAMURAI JACK is a work of art onto itself. The animators of the series gave the show a unique look. Rather than thick, clearly drawn border lines on the characters and the backgrounds, the characters are drawn without outlines, creating impressionistic geometric shapes that move freely through the action.

Since the drawings have no outlines, the series used bright colors to clearly define the interaction between character and background. The show also evokes classic samurai and western cinema through its use of action to tell the story. Usinglittle to no dialogue, many episodes were written by the animators as they were drawing out the storyboards rather than using pre-written scripts.

CLICK: What does the future of American animation look like? ComicsVerse takes a look.

For SAMURAI JACK, theaction is the story. Unfortunately, the series ended in 2004 before Jack could be given a proper ending to his story. Luckily, Adult Swim is reviving the series for one final season. Here are the episodes that best express SAMURAI JACK"s creative mandate of visual action as astory,which any fan should rewatch before Jack comes back for his final season this weekend.

Episode I: The Beginning

Of course, the first episode had to be mentioned, but I want to discuss a specific moment in this episode that establishes the power of SAMURAI JACK"s visual storytelling. I remember first sitting down to watch SAMURAI JACK as a kid. The show started and the first images of the series played out before my eyes. A tall black monolith against a red sky exploded out of the ground. No fanfare. Just a cacophonous explosion. The monolith turns slowly. A small flame, followed by a long, green, snake-like mouth turn around. Then the eyes open. Those bulbous eyes with beady pupils under flaming eyebrows. This was my first look at Aku, and his frozen Oni mask face unsettled my pre-pubescent mind. I was hooked before he even spoke.

The episode itself beautifully sets up the series to come. As a boy, Jack listens to his father recount the tale of how he initially defeated Aku and trapped him away forever. The tale is interrupted by the resurgence of the evil wizard. As his father is killed, Jack is sent away to train and prepare for the battle against Aku with his fathers magic sword in hand.

The tale is a simple one, but the animation style beautifully realizes the ancient lands of Jacks home and the training montage that follows Jack from youth to adulthood. Jacks journey brings to mind Bruce Waynes international training to avenge his familys death, but it also reveals the myriad of cultural influences that will play into future SAMURAI JACK episodes.

Episode XXV: Jack and the Spartans

Do you like Frank Millers 300 but always found yourself thinking, This story would be better with 100% more robots? Then the episode Jack and the Spartans are for you. Frank Millers comic RONIN clearly has its fingerprints all over the creative inspiration for SAMURAI JACK, so it is only appropriate that Genndy Tartakovsky and his team would pay homage to Millers tale of the 300 Spartans who faced impossible odds against an impossibly huge army.

CLICK: Want more action cartoons? Check out our thoughts on Netflix"s VOLTRON: THE LEGENDARY DEFENDERS

In this version, Jack helps the Spartans against a legion of Minotaur robots led by a Cthulhu-like mechanical master. True to form for the series, Jack and the Spartans rush through the robotic forces that threaten the homeland of the Spartans. The shows widescreen format allows the frames of each fight sequence to be filled with sliced robots and flying sparks as metal clashes against metal. Some of SAMURAI JACKs best sequences involve our hero mowing down hordes of robot adversaries, but it is this episode that delivers the coolest giant battle scenes in the series.

Episode xxxv: jack and the haunted House

SAMURAI JACK dipped its toes into a lot of genres, but it didn"t spend too much time with horror. One of the few times it did ended up becoming this phenomenal, fever-dream of an episode. Episode XXXV contains one of the most impressive animated sequences of the entire series. Jack stumbles across an abandoned home with a traditional Japanese structure. In searching the home, Jack discovers that a horrifying demon has taken possession of the house and its inhabitants.

What follows is a series of hallucinatory sequences with Jack seeing flashbacks to the family of the house getting possessed. No exposition about the demon or what occurred to the family is given but none is needed. The ambiguity of what is happening makes the visuals all the more haunting, culminating in Jack being taken by the demon.

The demons dimension looks like an ink wash painting from h**l. The demon and Jack are drawn with outlines that shake like a Richter scale creating a constant movement that gives everything an otherworldly quality and amplifies the terror of the demon that Jack must face. It is a visually stunning moment in a series built on visually stunning moments.

Episode XXXVII and XXXVIII: The Birth of Evil

Rarely ever do prequels live up to audience expectations, but as with many things, SAMURAI JACK turns those expectations on their heads with The Birth of Evil. This episode expands on the story Jacks father told him way back in episode one and provides further clues about the origin of Aku.

Once again, the animators behind SAMURAI JACK tell a story using only sound and visuals. The first part of this two-part episode is nearly dialogue-free, but it still manages to convey the terrifying origins of Aku. Its hard to select only one sequence from this two-parter to highlight. The opening scene with the pantheon of gods hunting Akus original form, Jacks father and his troops being picked off one by one as Aku explodes out of the Earth, the sickening cracks like horrible trees as Aku is born into his full form for the first time, or the battle between Jacks father and hundreds of Aku duplicates could all be classified as the greatest moment of these episodes.

CLICK: Want more swords and fantasy in the SAMURAI JACK vein? Check out the comic book HEAD LOPPER!

However, the strength of these episodes is how it succeeds where many prequels fail. It reveals interesting details about previously understood events rather than trying to add in needless twists. It doesnt attempt to reinvent the mythology of SAMURAI JACK, but it does enhance it. The episodes also show how confident the animators have become since the first season. This story of Akus origins could only have been told at its best once the animators became masters of storytelling in this world with little to no dialogue.

Episode XI, XVII, XLV, and XLVI: The Scotsman Trilogy

Im cheating a bit here, but its impossible to pick just one Scotsman episode as the best. The character of the Scotsman (voiced by none other than Bender and Jake the Dog himself, John DiMaggio) perfectly represents the off-beat sense of humor of SAMURAI JACK. While the show always presented its content seriously, it could at times be wickedly funny. With his cartoonish stature and insults, as well as his machine gun leg, the Scotsman provided SAMURAI JACK with three of its most action-packed and irreverent episodes.

Each of the Scotsmans episodes has a high-point of comedy in the series, from his endless string of insults toward Jack in his first appearance (Jack and the Scotsman)to Jacks discovery of what exactly haggis is (Jack and the Scotsman II). However, the best of these episodes might be The Scotsman Saves Jack pt. I and II. What makes this episode so fun is the complete reversal of the dynamic between the Scotsman and Jack.

Typically, Jack plays the straight man to all the bluster of the Scotsman. In this two-parter, however, the Scotsman stumbles upon an amnesiac Jack who inexplicably speaks with a Keanu Reeves, surfer-bro accent. What follows is an absolute romp of an episode with more STAR WARS references then you can shake a lightsaber at. If you want the best of comedy that SAMURAI JACK has to offer, these are the episodes to seek out.

Episode XLIV: The Princess and the Bounty Hunters

Part of what makes SAMURAI JACK such an innovative and exciting series is the eclectic world building. By having the show take place in the future warped by Akus sorcery, it allowed the creators to make the world of the series a glorious mishmash of technology and global cultures. The episode The Princess and the Bounty Hunters takes advantage of this in an episode that blends THE CANTERBURY TALES with the BATMAN: THE ANIMATED SERIES episode Almost Got Im.

A group of bounty hunters (a Southern gentleman, a Russian brute, a pair of cat-human hybrids, an aboriginal hunter, and a mysterious woman clad in a robotic suit), all converge on a snowed-in hut with the same goal: kill Samurai Jack.

Here the animators use visual storytelling to characterize each of the bounty hunters. As each of them shares their plan for taking out the samurai, the animation style switches to fit the culture the hunter is inspired by. The show switches from aboriginal artto traditional Chinese painting, to a silent film, to a crude crayon drawing, providing the audience with a new visual treat for an already visually stunning series. Typically, the bounty hunters that Jack squares off with are one-dimensional characters, but this episode provides a unique amount of pathos for these one-off antagonists as the story reaches its inevitable conclusion. This episode perfectly captures the anything-goes spirit that made the world of SAMURAI JACK such a rich and creative one.

Episode L: The Tale of X-9

Samurai, Cowboy, Gangster: These archetypes have existed in connection with each other throughout pop culture. Together they form a pyramid honor, a code existing outside the law of civilized society. While these stock characters are separated by time and countries, their characteristics are so similar that stories about one can be adapted into a story about the other. Kurosawas YOJIMBO became Leones A FISTFUL OF DOLLARS which became, in part, the Coen brothers MILLERS CROSSING. Even Jean-Pierre Melville"s tale of a French gangster is entitled LE SAMOURAI. It"s only fitting that SAMURAI JACK encountered the gangster archetype, too.

The X-9 of the title is a retired hit man/robot forced by Aku into one last job: take out Samurai Jack. If he can accomplish this, h**l be allowed to live in peace with his beloved dog Lulu. The episode hits all of the classic marks of the film noir gangster story the narration, the seemingly endless rain, the shadows and jazz but it also reinforces the similarities in the samurai and gangster archetypes. Much like Jack, X-9 follows a strict code of honor and acts to protect the innocent. He is tortured by his quest, but he knows he must fulfill it regardless.

The episode is particularly effective because of the new light it casts on the anonymous hordes of robotic enemies Jack has slain over the series. It"s especially bold for this story to be told as the third-to-last episode of the original series. Did all of the baddies Jack struck down over the last 50 episodes also have rich, inner lives? Seeing Jack outside the context of the hero to force us to question his actions makes this episode one of the standouts of the series.

Gotta Get Back, Back to the Past

With Jacks return this weekend, it remains to be seen how the new episodes will stack up against these classics of the original series. Many of the recent TV revivals that have popped up over the last few years have been at best underwhelming and at worst incredibly disappointing. However, if the animators continue to allow their stunning visuals to drive the action of the series, SAMURAI JACKs reputation as one of the best animated shows of all time will remain as untarnished as his magic sword.

Source: http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&ct2=us&usg=AFQjCNGY10Lpst8sCiCAvVVYMglAetfzyA&clid=c3a7d30bb8a4878e06b80cf16b898331&ei=G4vFWIgn1s_cAafnlJAB&url=https://comicsverse.com/samurai-jack/

Continue Reading ..

US Attorney Preet Bharara Says He Was Fired After Refusing to Quit

Continue Reading ..

McCain to Trump: Retract wiretapping claim or prove it


Bruno Mars - When I Was Your Man [Official Video]

Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John McCain (R-Ariz.) called Sunday for President Trump to either prove his claim that President Barack Obama tapped the phones in Trump Tower during last years election campaign or drop the accusation.

The president has one of two choices, either retract orprovide the information that the American people deserve, McCain said in an interview on CNNs State of the Union. I have no reason to believe that the charge is true, but I also believe that the president of the United States could clear this up in a minute.

McCain is one of several top lawmakersin Congress to call on Trump to provide evidence of his unsubstantiated claim that Obama ordered Trumps communications monitored. The senators call for more information follows a request from two leading members of the Senate Judiciary Committee forcopies of any warrant applications and court orders redacted as necessary related to wiretaps of President Trump, the Trump Campaign, or Trump Tower.

Former director of national intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. on March 5 denied that President Trump"s 2016 campaign was wiretapped while senators of both parties weighed in on the allegations. (Bastien Inzaurralde/The Washington Post)

Sens. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) formally requested the information last week in a letterto FBI Director James B. Comey and acting deputy attorney general Dana Boente. Trump administration officials have not provided any evidence to back up the presidents claim from earlier this month.

McCain avoided directly criticizing Trump for using Twitter to spread unverified information, but the senator said a serious charge, such as accusing a former president of illegal wiretapping, should not be handled lightly.

If the allegation is left out there, it undermines the confidence the American people have in the entire way that the government does business, McCain said.

Several lawmakers, including McCain and Senate Rules Committee Chairman Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), have pointed out that Trump could directly ask intelligence officials to corroborate his claim but instead has asked Congress to investigate.

The president actually could himself ask that question, Blunt said on Fox Newss Sunday Morning Futures.

Not all Republicans have been so quick to put the burden of proof on Trump. Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) agreed with Trump that Congress should take control of the investigation to safeguard sensitive intelligence.

President Trump said last weekend that he wanted the intelligence committees in the Senate and the House to take up this matter as part of a broader inquiry into Russias activities in our political system last year. Were going to do that,Cotton said Sunday on ABCs This Week.

Through a deliberate and careful process of examining all the intelligence at issue here, and then determining with the executive branch what we can declassify, I think the intelligence committees are in the best position to make those decisions, the senator added.

Here"s what happened after President Trump fired off a tweet accusing former president Barack Obama of wiretapping Trump Tower before the 2016 election. (Monica Akhtar/The Washington Post)

Source: http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&ct2=us&usg=AFQjCNFHtsVEd6BL3VDk01oGAToGPWctpw&clid=c3a7d30bb8a4878e06b80cf16b898331&cid=52779418226270&ei=33zFWIjTG4fN3gHV_6jQBA&url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2017/03/12/mccain-to-trump-retract-wiretapping-claim-or-prove-it/

Continue Reading ..

Millions might lose health coverage? Not to hear Republican leaders tell it.


Wheel of Musical Impressions with Adam Levine

White House press secretary Sean Spicer cast doubt on the Congressional Budget Office on March 8, saying "If you"re looking at the CBO for accuracy, you"re looking in the wrong place." The CBO is an independent office that is currently scoring the GOP health-care bill. (The Washington Post)

Depending on which outside analyst you ask, between 6 million and 15 million people would probably lose insurance coverage if the Republican alternative to the Affordable Care Act passes Congress and is signed into law.

Or, actually, lets revise that. Depending on whom you ask in Republican leadership, the real number is more like zero or, perhaps, negative: People will gain coverage under the proposal.

As part of the Republican push for the American Health Care Act, administration officials joined the Sunday political talk shows to offer their thoughts about the future of coverage. With analysis of the American Health Care Act from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office looming, the officials predictions about the effects of the bill were far rosier than the analysis offered by the Brookings Institution (15 million losing coverage over 10 years) or Standard & Poors (6 million to 10 million by 2024).

Heres what they said.

Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price: Coverage will increase. Appearing on NBCs Meet the Press, Price offered his vision for what success of the bill looked like.

Success, its important to look at that, he said. It means more people covered than are covered right now at an average cost that is less. I believe that we can firmly do that with the plan that weve laid out there.

Last year, Price, then a member of the House, offered an Affordable Care Act replacement bill that was vetoed by President Barack Obama. An analysis of that bill from the Congressional Budget Officefigured that 18 million people would lose coverage under that plan.

Price also told host Chuck Todd that nobody will be worse off financially under the proposal.

Gary Cohn, chief economic adviser to President Trump: Coverage will be maintained. On Fox News Sunday, Cohn was pressed by host Chris Wallace to explain whether the administration would continue to back the American Health Care Act if the Congressional Budget Office also were to predict that millions would losecoverage. He played Cohn a clip from 2015 of Trump on 60 Minutes.

I am going to take care of everybody, Trump said then. I dont care if it costs me votes or not. Everybodys going to be taken care of much better than theyre taken care of now. He repeated a similar claim shortly before his inauguration, telling The Washington Post that [w]ere going to have insurance for everybody. There was a philosophy in some circles that if you cant pay for it, you dont get it. Thats not going to happen with us.

Twenty million people gained coverage, have health insurance coverage now who didnt have it before Obamacare. Are some of them going to lose coverage, Wallace asked, because, one, youre going to end over a period of years the Medicaid expansion and, two, the tax credits are not going to provide as much help as the subsidies did to people who cant afford coverage.

Chris, we dont think so, Cohn replied. If youre on Medicaid, youre going to stay on Medicaid.

But not the expanded Medicaid, Wallace replied.

If youre on Medicaid, youre going to stay. The expansion is not going to change. There is a roll-off period, there is a period of transition, and were very confident that the period of transition is going to work, Cohn said.

House Speaker Paul D. Ryan: People will make their own choices. Ryan appeared on CBSs Face the Nation with John Dickerson. After Ryan (R-Wis.) offered his prediction that the Congressional Budget Office would estimate that coverage would drop, Dickerson asked how many people the speaker thought might lose coverage.

I cant answer that question. Its up to people, he said. Heres the premise of your question. Are you going to stop mandating people buy health insurance? People are going to do what they want to do with their lives because we believe in individual freedom in this country.

Its not our job to make people do something that they dont want to do, he added later. It is our job to have a system where people can get universal access to affordable coverage if they choose to do so or not.

Its worth noting that this contrasts with what the official website for the Republican repeal effort states. Linked prominently from Ryans official House website, the public American Health Care Act page explicitly states in a FAQ that millions wont lose coverage.

Budget Director Mick Mulvaney: Coverage isnt the important thing. On ABCs This Week, host George Stephanopoulos asked Mulvaney repeatedly whether Trumps pledge to cover everybody could be upheld. Mulvaney demurred, instead insisting that the coverage itself would be more affordable. It helps people get health care instead of just coverage, he said.

After the pair had gone back and forth a few times, Stephanopoulos asked specifically about what would happen if the Congressional Budget Office predicted that millions of people would lose coverage. Mulvaney, like press secretary Sean Spicer last week, pointed out that the officesestimates of coverage under the Affordable Care Actwere off, predicting more coverage than was actually seen.

If says that fewer people are going to be covered, youll simply reject that? Stephanopoulos asked.

If the CBO was right about Obamacare to begin with, there would be 8 million more people on Obamacare today than there actually are, Mulvaney replied. I love the folks at the CBO. They work really hard. They do. But sometimes we ask them to do things theyre not capable of doing, and estimating the impact of a bill of this size probably isnt the best use of their time.

It sounds like youll reject it, Stephanopoulos said, inadvertently summarizing more than just Mulvaneys response.

Source: http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&ct2=us&usg=AFQjCNGvZ_ny1L8gqPbMbh1GxQZh2h5lng&clid=c3a7d30bb8a4878e06b80cf16b898331&cid=52779410959197&ei=H3nFWMDJJsvapwfOu7q4Bg&url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2017/03/12/millions-might-lose-health-coverage-not-to-hear-republican-leaders-tell-it/

Continue Reading ..

What"s left of Spurs beats what"s left of Warriors; real question is how does league avoid games like this in future?


Golden State Warriors vs Minnesota Timberwolves - Full Highlights | Mar 10 2017 | 2016-17 NBA Season

This is what the Spurs do men go down with injuries, next man steps up. Kawhi Leonard (concussion), LaMarcus Aldridge (heart condition), Tony Parker (back) were all out, so Patty Mills stepped up with 21 points and an impressive performance (he should get some Sixth Man of the Year votes, but thats another topic).

That was better than the second team of the Warriors, who rested Stephen Curry, Klay Thompson, Draymond Green, and Andre Iguodala, all that on top of Kevin Durant still being out injured. The team that was out there was a defensive disaster, especially rotating out and contesting at the arc.

The Spurs won 107-85 in a game that wasnt interesting to start and became a blowout. TNTs David Aldridge summed up how we all feel.

Even the Andersons dont want tickets for Spurs-Dubs now.

David Aldridge (@daldridgetnt) March 11, 2017

This is not a good look for the NBA a marquee Saturday night, showcase game between two of the best teams in the NBA and the stars are all sitting. This instance was not on Gregg Popovich his guys were injured but in the past he has had no qualms about resting superstars on nationally televised games.

Blame for this if you think blame needs to dished out has to start with the NBA and its scheduling. In the quest to get the ratings-driver Warriors on more national games, the Warriors finished a gauntlet of eight games in eight cities in 13 days Saturday night. That included two cross-country flights. If the NBA wants playoff-quality games scheduled in prime time on Saturday night, then they need to think through the run-up to said games. Treat it like a playoff game, where the teams have at least a day and maybe three off in advance of it.

Warriors coach Steve Kerr said that the Warriors medical teams which tracks players with wearables in practice monitoring their condition told them guys needed rest. He was following their instructions, and its clear rest has been an issue. The Warriors are slumping, struggling without Durant, Curry and Thompson have been cold from three, but part of that is their legs look heavy. This team looked tired. Kerr did what he thought was best for his team.

The NBA loves analytics, and the numbers show rested players both play at a higher level and are less likely to be injured. Coaches that can afford to do so are going to rest guys to keep them fresh. This isnt on the player (usually), these are directives that comes from the coach or higher up the food chain.

But at what point does this start to turn the fanbase off? At what point dues it hurt ticket sales in arena or ratings on television because fans never know who might be rested on a given day. In a star-driven league like the NBA, sitting a healthy Curry or LeBron James or James Harden or whomever disappoint a fan base. And it almost always is done on the road, not at home to the home fans (and sponsors).

The answers here are not simple. The NBA, the players union, representatives from the teams all need to sit in a room and discuss this.

Is the answer to fine coaches who do this for nationally televised games? David Stern did this before? Television money is driving the league economy right now, and you can be sure ABC didnt love getting to run the Davis Bertans vs. Ian Clark show Saturday night in primetime. The problem here is Kerr would have just rested his players the night before in Detroit, hurting those fans but not the television audience. Also, this system is unfair to the Warriors, Cavaliers, and other teams on the biggest national stages with their games those teams are nationally televised all the times, where the Bucks or Grizzlies or a host of other teams would barely be touched by this.

But its not good for the league that we are talking about who didnt play, and not the game. And this has been the topic for days, all around the league and on sports talk radio. Its something the league needs to address this summer.

And while Id love to see a more holistic answer, maybe fines are the best call.

Source: http://nba.nbcsports.com/2017/03/11/whats-left-of-spurs-beats-whats-left-of-warriors-real-question-is-how-does-league-avoid-games-like-this-in-future/

Continue Reading ..

"Samurai Jack" Is Back, As Exciting and Beautiful As Ever

Continue Reading ..

VIDEO: Villanova Basketball releases new renderings of Finneran Pavilion


A Look at Villanova’s Amazing Basketball Facility and 2016-17 Footwear

Assuming most of you signed up to be a Finneran Pavilion Insider, you received an email tonight with a fresh video of the renderings that were released at a private donor event in New York City.

In typical Villanova fashion, one of those links in the email did not work. But the video on twitter does...

Here are the highlights that we see, but let us know if you see anything different. Also make sure to check out the FAQ portion of the Finneran Pavilion website which has been updated with in-depth detail:

  • The renovated walkway to the main entrance, with Villanova Athletics monuments (previously released), but also with a new overhead shot.
  • The reconfigured space behind the current student section, which will now be two floors with improved concessions and seating space. Of note, the entrace to the arena appears to be on the second floor, and the concourse will be 360 degrees throughout the building.
  • Several of the aforementioned lounges - which were told are meant to serve events, VIPs, and recruiting. A Hall of Fame exhibit will also be opened, as will the One Court Club which will house the 2016 Final Four floor.
  • A new locker room inside the Pavilion.
  • Renovated seating throughout note that the lower level of the sidelines appear to have chairbacks, while the upper level appears to have bleacher seating.
  • The current student section appears to be renovated into two separate levels. The students will be on both baselines, per the FAQ. My read is that it reduces the wall of students in the South end, and displaces the rest to the lower end of the North side.

My reaction:

Its really exactly what I expected given how close it is to the details I posted back in October. Capacity was never likely to increase, and gameday experience plus amenities, concessions, etc. were always going to be the priority.

I must say, the renderings look beautiful. The added cost of tickets, clubs, concessions, merchandise, etc. will bring in more money and make going to the games a heck of a lot more fun. But it does feel a bit rushed, and de-prioritized when looking at other projects around campus. This line was telling:

As with all projects on campus, cost is a significant consideration. Increasing seating capacity was considered, but a full teardown and rebuild to add seating would cost well over $125 million. With all of the other University projects currently being undertaken, borrowing for this project is not feasible. Therefore, the project needs to be funded entirely by donor support. While we have made significant progress toward our $60 million goal, we are still actively fundraising for the project.

Its something we know, but it still hurts. This is the flagship sport that the school has stated drives notoriety. But it will likely always come secondary to academics and the arts at villanova. this isnt ohio state or alabama. h**l, it isnt even Notre Dame. Its Villanova. It hurts to say, but the administration just cant see - or refuses to acknowledge - the revenue and visibility that sports drive in America.

A lot of this has to do with Bill Finnerans donation and the timeline associated with it. I think if Villanova could have raised $125 million and done this right, they would have. But theyre struggling to bring in $60M even with Finneran covering a third of it. Theres your story.

My biggest gripe? Spending $60 million and still leaving some fans with bleacher seating in the upper tank. Season ticket holders up there wont be happy with that and the increased cost of seating, I bet.

Villanova has shown the ability to build things beautifully in recent years and I have no doubt this building will be gorgeous when completed. Its just tough to know that there could have been more.

Source: http://www.vuhoops.com/villanova-basketball/2017/3/8/14864836/villanova-basketball-finneran-pavilion-video-renderings

Continue Reading ..