Tuesday, May 12, 2015

Nepal earthquake aid goes from Winter Park to Kathmandu



In her Winter Park condo, retired businesswoman Micheline Kramer keeps a poster-sized photo of her many children propped on a dining-room chair. She points to a 7-year-old sporting a ponytail and a gray hoodie.

"She wants to be a doctor," Kramer says of the girl. "And that one" a boy in a soccer jersey and glasses "he wants to be a hotel manager."

Others are would-be architects, singers, farmers and CEOs and even a couple who list their career aspiration as "dreamer." Nearly 100 in number, the children are not Kramer's by birth, of course. They are hers by sense of purpose.

Founder of the nonprofit Himalayan Youth Foundation, Kramer has made it her mission to help the children of Nepal by giving them a home, an education and the knowledge that someone cares about them.

Many had already lost one or both parents, even before the 7.8-magnitude earthquake on April 25 left more than 8,000 people dead.

"They call me 'mom,' and they need their mom to be there," she says, packing two giant duffel bags, one devoted solely to supplies. "They are so afraid. They are still having 10 aftershocks every day. And they never know if it will be a little one or a big one. And all of them have [extended] family in the villages in the mountains and don't know whether those relatives are still alive."

Kramer, 72, a former land developer and art dealer who fell in love with Nepal on her first visit in 1993, will return this week, despite the 7.3-magnitude aftershock early Tuesday, to bring supplies and comfort. She is due to arrive in Kathmandu Friday.

With support from several dozen Central Florida residents, who each sponsor a child or two in the home outside Kathmandu that Kramer manages, she has housed 127 kids, from age 6 to 18, including 25 now attending college. Though the valley has not taken a direct hit from the quake and its aftershocks, the home's three buildings are cracked and damaged. The solar panels are gone. The water-purification system ruined.

The children are traumatized.

In the days after the first quake, her charity rented a helicopter to check on the closest villages, looking for relatives. The photos emailed back by the staff showed expansive piles of rubble and little sign of life. The roads themselves have become impassable.

"I was so worried when I couldn't get any news," says Annetta Igou, a Winter Park interior designer who has sponsored a student in Nepal since he was in grade school. Now 19, the young man attends a university in Nepal. It was three days before he could send a message to Igou.

"If it hadn't been for you," he wrote through Facebook, "no one else would be looking for me."

Since launching the foundation in 2002, Kramer has gradually recruited a growing band of supporters, both across the U.S. and in Britain, where there is a branch of the charity run by her son. Neither of them, nor any other administrator, takes a salary. The annual budget is $340,000.

"You just keep hoping everyone is OK," says Gary Sorensen, who owns a direct-mail insurance company in Winter Park. He was persuaded to become a sponsor, at $1,600 a year, while on a Colorado ski-lift with Kramer more than a decade ago.

His "boy" will head to college next year to study Internet technology.

Brad Blum, a Winter Park businessman and philanthropist, was so moved by Kramer's passionate pitch about the children that he became a director on the foundation board and is joining her in Nepal later this week. He also will meet the two children he has sponsored since 2012 a girl who wants to be a doctor and a boy who wants to be a chef.

"His" children are safe, but information on their relatives is still trickling in.

"There have been some heartbreaking stories," he admits. "But there is also a lot of hope."

The Himalayan Youth Foundation is campaigning to raise $20,000 on CrowdRise.com to restore the home and help the children's families and villages. But Kramer also has a contingent offering more personal support.

In one of the duffel bags are 150 hats knitted by a half-dozen women in her condominium complex. Some, including retired school teacher Pamela Sherry, 70, had become pen pals with a child in Nepal and knitted their caps to order.

"I selected a girl who is an orphan, 14 years old, and I first wrote to her in December and just got a letter back that I absolutely treasure," Sherry says. "Every knit, every pearl, I thought of her."

ksantich@tribpub.com or 407-420-5503. For more information or to donate, go to hyf-us.org/.

Copyright 2015, Orlando Sentinel

Source: http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-nepal-earthquake-aid-orlando-20150512-story.html



Continue Reading ..

Twitter Reacts to Tom Brady's Suspension



The reaction to Tom Bradys suspension for his role in the deflation of footballs was violently polarized. When a player, celebrity or scholar sent out a Twitter message like Ridiculous, it was not always easy to tell if they felt the punishment was way too harsh or way too lenient.

Here is a sampling of Twitter reaction, running the gamut from All hail Saint Tom the martyr to Throw the book at him.

Too HarshJust RightToo LenientOther Takes

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/13/sports/football/twitter-reacts-to-tom-bradys-suspension.html



Continue Reading ..

Will Comcast's 2-Gigabit service be priced at $300 a month?



Potentiallypricing this speedy Gigabit Proservice far beyond the budget of the averageconsumer, Comcast published Web pages earlier today that statedthe 2-Gigabitservice would cost$299 a month for subscribers. Spotted by DSLReports first, Comcast quickly removed the pages that outlined the proposed service costs. The company then released a statement that indicated pricing, including introductory and promotional rates, are still being considered.

Interestingly, the leaked pricing is actually cheaper thanComcasts current top tier 505 plan, a505 Mbps service plan that costs $399.95 a month. Of course,getting that505 Mbpsservice installedcosts$250 in addition to another $250 fee for service activation. On top of those charges, the subscriber also has to commit to a 3-year contract period that includes an early termination fee of $1,000 if the contract is broken.

Comcast is expected to launch the Gigabit Pro service inAtlanta first and make itavailable toapproximately 18 million households before the end of the year. Regarding competition, Google is also launching Google Fiber in Atlanta. As that service rolls out, pricing will likely be similar to other cities with Googles 1-GigabitFiberservice priced at $70 per month.

There are no data caps on Google Fiber or theproposedGigabit Pro service from Comcast. Facing competition from other cable companies, c*x recently raised data caps dramatically for all subscribers. The companys most popular50 Mbps plan has been increased from a 250GB data cap to 350GB per month. The 100 Mbps plan has increased from 300GB a month up to 700GB and the150 Mbps tier skyrocketed from 400GB a month up to 2terabytes of data per month. c*x is also working to launch a GigaBlast service in several markets in order to increase download speeds for consumers.

Source: http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/comcast-2-gigabit-service-300-a-month/



Continue Reading ..

Top 100 Bay Area Restaurants



Photo: John Storey, Special To The Chronicle

gallery_thumbnails_show|article-gallery-6222735|article-gallery-6222735|0

gallery_overlay_open|article-gallery-6222735|article-gallery-6222735|0

gallery_overlay_open_thumbs|article-gallery-6222735|article-gallery-6222735|0

Chez Panisse has been part of the Top 100 since the guides first year.

Photo: John Storey, Special To The Chronicle

The interior of Liholiho Yacht Club in San Francisco, Calif., is seen on March 30th, 2015.

Photo: John Storey, Special To The Chronicle

Top 100 Bay Area Restaurants

Back to Gallery

gallery_thumbs_close|article-gallery-6222735|article-gallery-6222735|0

gallery_overlay_close|article-gallery-6222735|article-gallery-6222735|0

The Bay Area loves to eat. Our l**t and respect for food are centuries old.

Maybe its a legacy of the Gold Rush, when free lunch was offered at the brothels that dotted just about every street corner of San Francisco. Because of this link, theres always been a strong connection between food and carnal pleasure. Dining is more than sustenance its pure, unadulterated joy.

San Francisco has been a gold mine of originality for more than 160 years: the creation of Boudin sourdough bread in 1849; the first air-dried salami in 1896 from Molinari; the establishment of Ghirardelli chocolate in 1852 and Guittard in 1868. All these built a foundation of innovation that is clearly evident in the food scene today.

Ive been producing the Top 100 Bay Area Restaurants guide for 20 years, but with each edition I marvel anew at the quality of what we have. Chefs continue to start trends that then sweep the country small plates, open kitchens, communal tables and organic produce.

We have such a powerful restaurant scene that the list could swell to 150 or 200 and still exclude many excellent places. Thats what makes the task of creating this guide so wonderful, yet so challenging.

Each year I return to the restaurants on the previous years list and then fold in the reviews and Updates I write weekly in The Chronicle. Keeping up with this dynamic scene means I dine out every night sometimes consuming several meals in an evening. Ive visited each restaurant at least three times, and in most cases many more.

This year, 17 new restaurants earned a place in the Top 100. The newcomers are a mix of recently opened places, such as the Hawaiian-themed Liholiho Yacht Club, and reinvigorated establishments like Kokkari, which was on the list several years ago but fell off because of kitchen ennui. In such a competitive region, chefs must and do rejuvenate.

Four restaurants on the 2014 list closed. Its more than usual, even though a 4 percent attrition rate would be considered great in most business circles. We said goodbye to Abbots Cellar, Locals Corner, Etoile in the Domaine Chandon winery in Yountville, and Coco500 (which became the home of the Top 100 Marlowe).

With the thousands of restaurants that have opened since my first guide two decades ago, its amazing that 10 restaurants have bested the competition and still make the list: Acquerello, Boulevard, Chez Panisse, French Laundry, La Folie, Swan Oyster Depot, Terra, Yank Sing, Zarzuela and Zuni Cafe.

The determining factor for what makes it and what doesnt is when I can answer the following question in the affirmative: Is this restaurant a destination, a place I would travel to just for the pleasure of dining there?

The 2015 list is designed to be a living document. Youll find a new, improved and easily searchable version online at www.sfchronicle.com. Ill also update the list periodically, adding new places that will probably have a spot on next years list.

In the meantime, check out this years Top 100 Bay Area Restaurants. I hope it will lead you to the best dining experiences in the best food region in America.

Michael Bauer is The San Francisco Chronicle restaurant critic. Find his blog at http://insidescoopsf.sfgate.com and his reviews on www.sfchronicle.com. E-mail: mbauer@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @michaelbauer1

Source: http://www.sfchronicle.com/food/top-100-2015/article/Top-100-Bay-Area-Restaurants-6222735.php



Continue Reading ..

Monday, May 11, 2015

Revenge boss breaks down series finale: 'I think it felt really right'



Warning: This story contains spoilers from the series finale of Revenge. Read at your own risk!

Emily Thornes quest for Revenge came to an end in the aptly titled Two Graves. And yes, two graves were filledbut not in the way viewers expected.

During Revenges swan song, Emily (Emily VanCamp) escaped jail with an eye toward proving Victoria (Madeleine Stowe) was still alive. But once Jack (Nick Wechsler) was caught in the crossfire, Emily vowed to kill her nemesis once and for all.

However, both Margaux (Karine Vanasse) and Louise (Elena Satine) eventually turned on Victoria and helped lead Emily to her final showdown with the Grayson matriarch. Though Emily had every intention of killing Victoria, David (James Tupper) spared her soul by pulling the trigger first. Still, Victoria got a shot off, making viewers believe for a split second that Emily would fill that second grave.

Instead, it was David who eventually perished from cancer after a judge granted him leniency for killing Victoria and let him spend his final days at home with his daughter. Emily got her happy ending by marrying Jack, while Nolan (Gabriel Mann) took up the mantle of righting other peoples wrongs. But was this ending always the plan for Amanda Clarke? And what did that reveal about the identity of Victorias real father actually mean? EW caught up with showrunner Sunil Nayar to find out:

ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: Was it always the plan to give Emily a happy ending? SUNIL NAYAR: No, certainly not. The plan was to discuss every kind of ending possible as we got to the end of this journey. At the end of the day, at the end of the show, it felt that she deserves to be with Jack. She deserves to sail off into the sunset, though not without experiencing great loss and great tragedy. But it felt that she deserved it. I think and I hope that when the audience and you guys saw it, you agreed. But I think it felt really right.

What were some of the alternate endings you considered?We explored anything you could think of. We explored both women actually being dead, we explored only Emily dying and Victoria living. We took a look at every single majorly dramatic option from the viewpoint of how do we want to the story to end, and also from our audiences point of view who have been such fans of the show. Really, to try to experience it from their moment-to-moment lens and thinking, if Im taking the end of this journey, where do I want to feel Ive gotten to by the very end? At the end of that day, it felt that Amanda needed and wanted to be alive and needed and wanted to be with Jack. So there was an end to the journey as opposed to a stop, which felt like it couldve been too dark for what I think the audience deserved by the end of all of this.

The dream Emily was having about Charlotte giving her Victorias heart was just a dream, right? Is that just your way of saying Emily can never really let her go?Thats a question that well never know the actual answer to. What I was very much hoping for, and in speaking to Emily [VanCamp] and Madeleine about it was, what are the psychological ramifications of what Victoria had done to Emily? Or, if it in fact it is a physical reality of Victoria keeping Emily alive, I like that idea that is a question that is going to resonate. Because even though youve seen this nightmare, some nightmares are based in reality and some are notas this show has shown many times through both Emily and Victorias psyche. So, for me, there is no answer to that question. I think that the debate of the question is fun, and I think people have definitive opinions of whether its a yay or nay. But I just like the idea that, like anything else, you dont know and youll never know.

I didnt quite understand the reveal about who Victorias father really is. Were you trying to say its Conrad? Can you explain?When we tapped deep into the history of the show in that flashback episode, where we first met Marian Harper, you learned that Victoria had taken the fall for this thing that her mother did when she killed a man. When she came back, her mother was dating a new man who essentially molested Victoriaand her mother, being such a horrible human being, blamed her daughter for essentially enticing the man who Victoria, in that scene that you saw last night, learned to be her father. It went much farther back. But her mother was trying to say that you didnt get your heart from your father, your father was an even more lecherous person than I was.

Can you talk about Victorias decision to shoot Emily? Was that just a last-ditch effort to take her down and ensure she didnt get a happy ending?I think to some extent, yes. Also, because the thing thats always rattling through Victorias mind is the people that she still cares about and the people she still needs to protect. Knowing that David Clarke, because she still had vague consciousness when David Clarke was saying everything he was doingbut she doesnt know how Emily feels about Charlotte, or Patrick, or the few people out there that she cares about. Theres also this undercurrent of, its her last act of revenge but also of protection, but it is to ensure Emily/Amanda doesnt get her happy ending.

Are we to infer that Emily reconciled with Charlotte (Christa B. Allen)?Absolutely, yeah. Yes, which is why you knew exactly what happened with Charlotte. They absolutely finally have the chance to be the sisters they never were.

So was Nolans happy ending just to be able to help other people who need revenge?Yes, but also that hes absolutely able to stand on his own. When we saw him say to Emily that hes trained for four years under the best sensei and that hes going to go take care of this Margaux situation, its a bold move for him because hes going without her. And he learns, Oh, I can do this. Ive become my own person in the nature of this show. One of the reasons we did the lovely arc with Tony dating him is that Nolan was with a real person, and hes become a real personstill with his eccentricities and his brilliance, but its now grounded in the world where he doesnt feel like an outsider. He could stand on his own two feet, and when that young man comes to him, and without Emily there, he says, I can help you, and knows that he can do it.

Was the plan for him to be in ABCs Kingmakers, which failed to get a series order at ABC?I dont know that there was a plan for him to be the through-line, but definitely it had been discussed that had Kingmakers goneand Im very sad for Sallie Patrick that it didntbut there was definitely talk of him possibly showing up in the show because he is definitely still part of our universe. There definitely wouldve been an intention to have a character show up on Kingmakers.

You said there was going to be a small cliffhanger in the series finale. To which were you referring: the heart or Nolan?It was the Nolan thing, mostly. Although ironically, the heart was a part of it too, because had the show gone on, we talked about the possibility in the most vague of ways that Nolan would help this young man and he sort of gets into the case. Emily and Jack are off living their lives, and the woman comes to her and says, You have my sons heart and he was wronged. So, Emily is inspired to maybe help this woman because, My gosh, it is the sons heart, and maybe my nightmare isnt true, but also while this nightmare of Victoria still haunts her. But again, it was the most un-sketched out possibility because we all slowly got the sense the story was ending, and took a breath and let it end. But the Nolan thing was mostly the cliffhanger there.

Is Margaux behind bars? And Louise part of the inner circle?Exactly. Margaux realized how far down the road shed gone, and to do the honorable thing that her father never would. So, the belief has to be that Margaux is in jail or facing trial, and that Louise did come around. And that Louise understood that she didnt see Victoria for who she was, and ultimately, did the most powerful thing she has ever done, which was go back to Emily and Nolan. We loved the idea that she was in the inner circle, because we had to build her inbecause if there was another season, we basically were going to have her buy the land of Grayson Manor and build this beautiful Southern estate on it, and she would be another big player in the Hamptons.

Ultimately, did Emily need to leave the Hamptons to get her happy ending? And was Jack always the endgame?I mean, he was always one of the major options that we discussed. It was always one that we could never really find a problem with, except that the audience expected it to some extent. It did feel right. But she did always need to get out of there, because that was always her plan, and she did need to get out of there with Jack because that was always his plan. They will be happy, but this world of the Hamptons doesnt carry happy memories for them anymore. So this departure together for them felt earned and right.

Are there stories you wish you got to tell with these Revenge characters?Not these characters. I wish wed had more time as we got to the end to tell all the stories we were hoping to. I still feel, just because of time, Mason didnt get a proper send off. We wanted to give him one, and if wed had 30 more minutes in last nights episode or if it was a two-hour episode, we couldve worked it into the story where Mason also finishes up. There are just characters we wish we couldve spent more time with in the finale. We had to cut the episode because so much great emotion came in. So there were even moments in this finale, moments with Stevie and moments with Charlotte that unfortunately we had to cut out, that I imagine will be on the DVD extras if people still even do DVD extras. But theres a couple of other scenes that unfortunately got a short shrift because we needed to tell a lot of story in our 42 minutes.

Any in particular that you can share?We were going to have Charlotte go off to college and get her life together while Jack moved out to California with Emily. And then we also set up with Louise and the Grayson Manor estate. Those little seeds that would spur a story on. But Mason we never managed to get to in the series finale, and Roger Bart did such an extraordinary job with that character. I wouldve loved to give the audience an idea of where his story resolved, but you never know: If Nolan gets a spin-off, well stick Mason in it too.

What wouldve happened to Mason?We dont know, honestly. We had him in those nice scenes with Madeleine in the second-to-last episode, but the idea we would always talk about is the end of Silence of the Lambswhere you just see him put on his hat and disappear into a crowd, to go somewhere to live his life and be whatever hes going to be.

Source: http://www.ew.com/article/2015/05/11/revenge-series-finale-spoilers



Continue Reading ..

NHL Playoffs 2015: Updated Schedule, Predictions for Remaining 2nd-Round ...



Phelan M. Ebenhack/Associated Press

With the Anaheim Ducks' win over the Calgary Flames on Sunday night, only two more series remain in the second round of the 2015 NHL playoffs.

The New York Rangers and Washington Capitals are tied at 3-3, while the Tampa Bay Lightning own a slim 3-2 lead in their battle with the Montreal Canadiens.

Here's a brief forecast for how each of the remaining series will unfold from here.

Tues., May 12 7:30 p.m. Montreal Canadiens Tampa Bay Lightning NBCSN Wed., May 13 7:30 p.m. Washington Capitals New York Rangers NBCSN Thurs., May 14 TBD Tampa Bay Lightning Montreal Canadiens TBD

* denotes game may not be necessary

Series Predictions

Tampa Bay Lightning vs. Montreal Canadiens

The Lightning have had two chances to close out this series so far. Seriously, they can't take a 3-0 lead and fail to advance against the Canadiens. That would be a postseason collapse of epic proportions.

Montreal won 6-2 in Game 4 and 2-1 in Game 5. Speaking after the Lightning's Game 5 loss, Steven Stamkos talked about his desire to close out the series at home.

"There's pressure for [Montreal] knowing it could be the last game of the year," he said, per the Associated Press (via CBSSports.com). "We're coming in to our home rink where we've played very well. We have to go prove that last home game we played was unacceptable and I believe we'll do that. Our fans deserve for us to win a game in front of them."

Few teams have been more affected by the low-scoring nature of this postseason than the Lightning. Their 3.16 goals per game ranked first in the regular season, but they're averaging just 2.6 a game against the Canadiens. Take out their six goals in Game 2, and the number falls to 1.75.

Lighting coach Jon Cooper offered up his reasoning for why scoring is down in the postseason, per USA Today's Kevin Allen:

There are top offensive players who are really paying attention to defense. I think that is what has kind of smothered (offense). There is such a commitment to playing defense now because teams know you really only need to get one, maybe even two (goals), there is a real good possibility you are going to win the game. That's probably what's stifling a lot of the offense.

Should Tampa Bay fail to win Game 6, things could really get interesting. But the Lighting should prevail in Game 6. Their offense is too good to fall on its face three games in a row.

New York Rangers vs. Washington Capitals

The No. 1 overall seed in the Eastern Conference is in serious danger of elimination in the second round. Were it not for Henrik Lundqvist making some big saves, the Rangers likely would have been packing their bags Sunday night:

Relying too heavily on a goaltender can be a recipe for disaster in the postseason, even more so for a team that ranks 15th out of 16 playoff teams in average scoring. New York was one of the higher-scoring teams during the regular season, but it's putting a lot of stress on Lundqvist and the blueliners.

ESPN Stats & Info also highlighted how the Rangers have been unable to win without some sort of drama in the postseason:

It would be unfair to say that New York has simply gotten lucky in the playoffs, but nobody can deny that luck has played a factor for the Rangers so far. You can't have that many one-goal games otherwise.

The question regarding the Rangers is whether that luck might run out in Game 7.

CBS Sports' Adam Gretz drew attention after Game 6 to the Capitals' anemic power-play unit. The No. 1 power-play team during the regular season is just a paltry 3-of-25 in the playoffs and 1-of-12 in this series.

It sounds like Washington is due for some success on the power play, while the Rangers' continued reliance on their defense might end up being their undoing.

Maybe Sunday's offensive outburst was a sign that New York is getting back to the perfect balance that resulted in so much regular-season success. In addition, NHL.com's Dan Rosen added that history is in the Rangers' favor:

If the Capitals can make the most of their power-play opportunities in Game 7, they'll walk out of Madison Square Garden with a win.

Note: All stats are courtesy of NHL.com unless otherwise noted.

Source: http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2460470-nhl-playoffs-2015-updated-schedule-predictions-for-remaining-2nd-round-series



Continue Reading ..

Happy Mothers Day from all of us at the Pleasanton Weekly



Mother's Day was first celebrated in 1908, when Anna Jarvis held a memorial for her mother at St Andrew's Methodist Church in Grafton, West Virginia, which now holds the International Mother's Day Shrine.[

According to a write-up in Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, her campaign to make "Mother's Day" a recognized holiday in the United States began 100 years ago in 1905, the year her beloved mother, Ann Reeves Jarvis, died. Anna's mission was to honor her own mother by continuing work she started and to set aside a day to honor mothers, "the person who has done more for you than anyone in the world".

Anna's mother, Ann Jarvis, was a peace activist who cared for wounded soldiers on both sides of the Civil War and created Mother's Day Work Clubs to address public health issues.

In 1908, Congress rejected a proposal to make it an official holiday, among jokes that they would have to proclaim also a "Mother-in-law's Day".

Due to the campaign efforts of Anna Jarvis, by 1911 all states observed the holiday, with some of them officially recognizing Mother's Day as a local holiday, the first in 1910 being West Virginia, Jarvis' home state.

In 1914 Woodrow Wilson signed the proclamation creating Mother's Day, the second Sunday in May, as a national holiday to honor mothers.

By the early 1920s, Hallmark and other companies started selling Mother's Day cards, which Jarvis protested was becoming a misinterpretation and exploitation of the holiday that she had worked so hard for as a day to be about sentiment, a day to appreciate and honor mothers by writing a personal letter, by hand, expressing love and gratitude, rather than buying gifts and pre-made cards.

Even so, Jarvis' holiday was adopted by other countries and it is now celebrated all over the world, both as a day of sentiment to honors mothers but also as an engine of consumerism. It's celebrated with varying enthusiasm, in various ways, and on various days, though more often than not on the second Sunday in May as in the U.S.

Brian Handwerk, writing in National Geographic, and the National Retail Federation, report that Americans will spend an average of $162.94 on mom this year, down from a survey high of $168.94 last year. Total spending is expected to reach $19.9 billion. The U.S. National Restaurant Association reports that Mother's Day is the year's most popular holiday for dining out.

Hallmark Cards itself, which sold its first Mother's Day cards in the early 1920s, reports that Mother's Day is the number three holiday for card exchange in the U.S., behind Christmas and Valentine's Day.

About 133 million Mother's Day cards are exchanged annually, according to Hallmark. After Christmas, it's the second most popular holiday for giving gifts.

There are no comments yet. Please share yours below.

Source: http://www.pleasantonweekly.com/news/2015/05/10/happy-mothers-day-from-all-of-us-at-thepleasanton-weekly



Continue Reading ..