Sunday, December 4, 2016

Self-help guru James Arthur Ray is looking for forgiveness following ...


Sweat Lodge Survivor Story
A new CNN documentary tells the story of James Arthur Ray.

Photo illustration by Lisa Larson-Walker. Photos by Astrid Stawiarz/Getty Images, Thinkstock.

James Arthur Ray, for a time the most flamboyant figure in the ultra-flamboyant world of self-help seminars, last made headlines in October 2009, when he parboiled 56 disciples during a botched sweat-lodge ceremony intended as the climax of his $9,695-a-head Spiritual Warrior retreat. On the day of the parboiling, Ray badgered people who were already vomiting, hallucinating, or passing out to play full on! as he liked to say, urging manic commitment to the exercise at hand. Attendees remember him thundering at one point, Todays a good day to die! Three of his followers took him at his word, while 17 others suffered from burns, severe dehydration, and/or kidney failure. The guru ultimately spent 20 months in prison for negligent homicide.

Ray and his Sedona, Arizona, Waterloo are now the subject of Enlighten Us, a heavily promoted CNN documentary out Thursday. [Update, Dec. 1: CNN announced its pushing back the release to Saturday.] Despite its whimsical title, the film examines Ray through a surprisingly credulous lens, making him seem almost as much a casualty of s**t happens as a convicted criminal. Viewers hear Rays explanations of how personal growth always entails risk; they are shown his desolation at having watched his thriving $10 million business go up in literal smoke.

In both the film and in life, Ray is poorly cast as the martyr of self-help culture. Hes far from it: Ginny Brown, mother of 38-year-old victim Kirby Brown, recalls that when Ray finally reached out to her after her daughters death, a full five days later, he kept saying over and over, that he couldnt believe this had happened ... to him. Seven years later, Ray does not seem to have changedindeed, he is currently petitioning to have his conviction set aside. The state of Arizona is countering the motion vigorously, as are families of those killed.

Legal maneuvers like the one Ray is attempting rarely succeed in homicide cases. But the hubris of even trying reaffirms that far from offering a story of redemption, Ray remains the epitomic reminder that self-help culture may be less about bettering the self than about creating alternative realities in which your unimproved self is just fine.

Ray came to prominence when he caught the eye of Oprah Winfrey during a cameo in the 2006 blockbuster DVD The Secret. (In those days, if you were a guru who caught Oprahs eye, and she gave you a platform on her uber-hot show, you were golden. Ray became golden.) The secret to The Secrets success was its law of attraction, the literal belief that if you send the right vibes out into the universe, you will receive in return your hearts desire. Rays proprietary shtick (every guru is required to have one) was a Secret derivative called harmonic wealth, an arcane system of spiritual time management that supposedly merged the law of attraction with quantum physics in vowing to keep followers finances, relationships, and physical and mental health in perfect balance. Early in the titular book, Ray observes that everything in the universe is perfectly orchestrated for your betterment, growth, and evolution whether youre consciously aware of it or not. (The astute reader might wonder, why do I need this book?)

Ray is poorly cast as the martyr of self-help culture.

People often flock to gurus like Ray to learn to be more focused and less conflicted; often those conflicts are in areas of ethics, or people require a certain mental and emotional toughness that assigns a lower priority to the wants of others. In exchange for his exorbitant prices, Ray proposed to furnish his followers with self-talkthis mantra largely consisted of code for rationalizing mistakes, damage to others, and other messy details of daily living. Well-aware of his need for a competitive advantage in a genre that seemed to spawn new gurus daily and to keep people interested enough to attend each new event, Ray kept adding new and ever-more-eccentric winkles to his programs. There has always been a pronounced tendency in self-help circles to equate eccentric with cutting-edge, despite the fact that there is, for example, zero science vetting a mystical outreach to the universe. There is, however, plenty of evidence testifying to the psychological dangers of stripping away peoples egos and defense mechanisms in a group setting. Ray would add more evidence to the latter as he began holding court over getaways and physical escapades that went far beyond his mantras.

Rays followers probably gave insufficient thought to the fact that their intrepid leader, too, was focused on a goalhis own enrichmentand had assigned a lower priority to the needs of others: specifically, them. Indeed, his followers continued to make ever-larger purchases of more and more materials and seminars, following Ray to a netherworld of financial and emotional investment where only he knew the endgame.

By 2009 Rays rugged good looks and sexy bluster had made him the matinee idol of the motivational set. He presented his large-format, upselling spiel to standing-room-only crowds in venues that on other nights might host conventions. His eponymous company went to $10 million in revenues in about two years.

Three months before the sweat lodge, during a Creating Absolute Wealth event (which absolutely created $4,000 worth of wealth per customer for Ray), a woman named Colleen Conaway apparently had a psychotic break and leaped to her death from an upper level in San Diegos Horton Plaza shopping mall during an exercise in which Ray ordered his followers to channel the mindset of the homeless. (Participants had to dress up in worn clothes and leave their money, cellphones, and IDs behind.) Conaway was by all accounts happy and well-adjusted prior to the eventin no way suicidal. Her sister, Lynn Graham, has blamed the tragedy on Rays heavy-handed tactics and brainwashing. Ray was never formally accused of being responsible for the death. But consider his response: Evidence suggests that Ray himself, who was lunching at the upscale mall, knew about the incident within moments. Nevertheless, Ray and his crew stonewalled other participants about the whereabouts of the missing attendee during the rest of the days activities, none of which were canceled. They even went on with the customary after-partythere are pictures of the gaiety.

Just like their mantras encouraged, their intrepid leader was focused on a goalhis own enrichmentand had assigned a lower priority to the needs of others.

Whether or not you believe 20 months in prison is a just punishment, Ray has also now been reduced to coaching entrepreneurs one on one or presenting to cozy gatherings in hotel banquet rooms that are a far cry from his former haunts. But even in the wake of his sentencing and prison stint, he deflects responsibility for his crimes. He continues to alibi for the sweat-lodge death by way of offhand analogies to other adventuresome undertakings. h**l ask, Why do people sky-dive? He does not address whether theyd still sky-dive if they knew that an inept instructor had failed to properly rig the chute. (Despite the serious conditions, there were no medical personnel on hand at Sedona.) h**l argue that his followers were adults who knew the risks and were willing to go the extra mile for personal empowerment.

He has said repeatedly, and says again in the CNN film, An accident occurred, and it was prosecuted as a crime.

Except it wasnt a mere accident. As Ginny Brown retorts, He orchestrated the event that made death inevitable. He was told the year before that if you keep doing this, people will die. Indeed, prior Ray sweat lodges had sent people to the hospital with heat stroke. There were other red flags, along with Conaways suicide: The prior year, participants broke bones during a karatelike brick-breaking exercise held as part of Rays Hawaiian Modern Magick event.

His brochures and materials made his events sound like masterworks of planning and forethought, when, in reality, he committed almost astonishing oversights. There were no formally trained martial-arts personnel on hand at Modern Magick, just as there were no medical personnel in Sedona.

And yet, seven years after that awkward phone call to Ginny Brown, Ray continues to make the Sedona deaths sound like footnotes in a disaster that principally befell him. He blogs about losing his entire life savings, his home, his reputation.

In hindsight, though, hes grateful for the opportunity the sweat-lodge deaths gave him to grow. Again, this is the raw core of Rays teachingslook inward at yourself, no matter the cost to otherseven if the cost to others is death, apparently.

I found myself, he writes on his site.

Source: http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2016/12/self_help_guru_james_arthur_ray_is_looking_for_forgiveness_following_the.html

Continue Reading ..

New CNN Documentary Examines Convicted New Age Guru James ...


CNN New Day Interview - James Arthur Ray

In October 2009, James Arthur Ray was atop his game. A best-selling author and spiritual leader he disdains self-help guru his company had earned $9.4 million the previous year. His books, DVDs and seminars were marketed to those who eagerly embraced his philosophy of personal growth by confronting and learning from their fears.

He was catapulted to prominence after appearing in the hugely popular 2006 self-help movie The Secret. Oprah interviewed him on back-to-back shows. Couples paid more than $100,000 per year to join an exclusive circle with one-on-one access to him. When he charged $9,695 apiece for clients to attend a five-day retreat in the scrublands outside of Sedona, Arizona, some 60 people signed up.

But then three people died in Sedona as part of a sweat lodge exercise Ray led, and everything collapsed as revisited in the documentary Enlighten Us: The Rise and Fall of James Arthur Ray. The film explores questions not only of Rays personal responsibility, but of the needs and responsibilities of those who seek to be led.

The film debuts at 8 p.m. and replays at 9:55 p.m. ET Saturday, Dec. 3, on CNN.

The Sweat Lodge Tragedy

On Oct. 8, 2009, Ray and his Sedona retreat participants packed themselves, skin-against-skin, into that 415-sq.-ft. makeshift sweat lodge meant to push them through their limits and cleanse mind and body. He promised the most intense heat youve ever experienced, I can guarantee you that, according to a recording of the event made by his staff.

But as wave after wave of hot rocks were brought inside, people were overcome. Two died at the scene; 19 were hospitalized, including a third person who died later.

Ray, 59, was convicted of negligent homicide and sentenced to two years in prison.

James Arthur Ray

Three years after finishing his time, Ray tells PEOPLE: I believe totally and completely that we all must take full and complete responsibility for our lives, and I have taken full and complete control and responsibility for the situation that occurred.

My work was never on trial, he says. The tragedy was on trial. The jury found absolutely no shred of evidence of intentional misconduct or harm. It was a tragic accident, and it was determined to be negligent, and because three people died, it was determined to be criminally negligent.

I repented, I grieved, I anguished, and I finally got my head back on and began studying my craft and how I was going to utilize that to better my own life, and also to better the lives of those people Im blessed to serve, he says.

The comeback and the be back and the I am back is here. A lot of what that entails is me processing for myself exactly what occurred, and going through that process of responsibility, redemption, and then moving toward resilience.

In the film, which premiered earlier this year at the TriBeCa Film Festival, family members of those who died object to Rays return to the work he was doing when those three lives were lost. I still think hes dangerous, says one, who is unidentified, because he doesnt understand that his actions actually made these deaths inevitable.

A Case Study in Charisma

Filmmaker Jenny Carchman does not otherwise include interviews with relatives of Liz Neuman, 49, a mother of three who worked on Rays events; James Shore, 40, a father of three; and Kirby Anne Brown, 38, a decorative artist. (After Brown died, her family created an organization, SEEK Safely, designed to educate, empower and promote the public about the unregulated self help industry,according to the nonprofits website.)

Says Carchman, who did meet with Browns family while making the documentary: Their story is so deep and awful and tragic, and so understandably complicated, so much so that it could be an entire film.

The grief and the loss of the victims is horrible, but its a very separate story than the one we were telling, she tells PEOPLE. Instead, she says she found herself drawn to the topic after reading about Rays sentencing, and was pulled into the question of how people could die while on a quest for improvement. Meeting Ray for the first time while he was jailed, I realized he was such a compelling and very intriguing person that I wanted to follow up.

Want to keep up with the latest crime coverage? Click here to get breaking crime news, ongoing trial coverage and details of intriguing unsolved cases in the True Crime Newsletter.

In reviewing videos of Ray giving lectures and seminars at his peak, he was very dynamic and alive and controlled and groomed jumping around the stage and full of energy and a big personality, compared to the scattered, scared and tearful man she first encountered. He was both full of himself, and also denigrating. You see someone who was really lost, she says. I kept thinking about a boxer out of the ring.

Carchman spent two years tracking Ray on his search as he redefines and reclaims his purpose. But she also interviews several of Rays former clients and supporters, some of whom attended the fateful Sedona retreat, to provide a first-person look inside the sweat lodge exercise and its aftermath, when Ray on the advice of an attorney, he says fled and left his followers abandoned.

In the film, Ray says: I had gone back to my room, and I was like still not all together, cause Ive just run this serious marathon on the tail end of an extremely emotionally taxing week already. And so I get in the shower, and when I get out, theres a rap on my door, and its the police.

At another point he says: When they told me there were people in serious distress, I was like, what? I was in shock. I mean, my entire life completely collapsed within the period of about 15 minutes.

He tells the filmmaker: In my mind its like, investigating this as a homicide, you might get arrested, attorneys saying get out of there I mean, what would you do?

Ray fought criminal charges that initially included manslaughter, for which the jury found him not guilty while still faulting him for negligent homicide.

At his sentencing the judge said: The evidence from the trial and presentence proceedings show that Mr. Ray, as misguided as he was, believed he was helping people. And the evidence is that people believed they were being helped. The court is still left to wonder, how is it that so many educated, knowledgeable people ignored basic common sense?

Ray: It Had to Happen

Carchmans film contains a startling conclusion from Ray, who is asked by the filmmaker how the tragedy could have happened.

Although he is seen giving a teary apology in court, and emotionally referencing the event in small-scale seminars as he begins again to court clients, Ray answers: It had to happen, because it was the only way I could experience and learn and grow through the things that Ive done. You come out of a situation like this and youre either bitter and angry, or youre more awake and grateful, and I choose awake and grateful, and I choose to see it as a test of character, and a test through fire, and I think I did OK.

Asked by PEOPLE what he has done for the families of those who died, Ray says: Ive done everything thats been asked of me. Ive served my time, I paid restitution, I reached out to them, contrary to what was reported. I received mixed response from that reaching out. He explains further: I received an order, a legal document, when I was in custody stating that if I was to contact them in any way, there would be legal ramifications. Ive respected that and honored that and Ive abided by the law.

Im not ignoring what happened, he says. Just the opposite. In fact, Im using it to help make everyone I engage with the very best they can be. I can talk to a lot larger audience from a broader perspective of experience today than I ever could before.

But he is no longer on the road 250 days a year. Gone is the 7,500-sq.-ft. Beverly Hills mansion with the home gym and movie theater, on which he had fallen months behind in payments prior to his sentencing. He emerged from prison in debt. Divorced and single since before his rise to fame, he lives now in a 1,600-sq.ft., three bedroom condo in the Hollywood Hills. He coaches clients online, and makes far fewer personal appearances than he once did.

Im exactly where I should be, and I must be, the son of an Oklahoma minister tells PEOPLE. My career is not a career for me, its a calling, and I say that very much with conviction. I never aspired to be a self-help guru. How I see myself is as a catalyst. Im a catalyst to action, to help people stop dreaming and start doing.

He is slightly critical of the film, and says he expected it to be a deeper examination of the legal system that came after him. But he says hes never lost regard for those who died.

People who invest in themselves are like professional athletes, he says. Around the legal issues, theres a whole other story that is not told in the documentary, not covered in the press, glossed over at the trial. The judge didnt want to hear it; the jury didnt want to hear it.

I believed without a doubt that we were all safe, he says. I again take full and complete responsibility for the accident. I conceived of the exercise; we all believed in it. I led it, but I also participated in it. I didnt anticipate what happened.

Sure, we all did something that was extreme. I fully know that Liz Neuman, James Shore and Kirby Brown are not victims theyre heroes.

James, Liz and Kirby were there for a reason. Its a reason we all have. Its compelling people to do more, to be more, and to become more. They were totally and completely committed to that end. And so to me, thats heroic. I think its disrespectful to their memory to label them as victims. I honor them. I hold them in the highest regard, and if their life is going to continue to have meaning which, if I have anything to do with it, it will then I believe the story needs to be told from their heroic position rather than a victim position.

Source: http://people.com/crime/new-cnn-documentary-examines-new-age-guru-james-arthur-ray-convicted-in-3-deaths-in-sweat-lodge-tragedy/

Continue Reading ..

Saturday, December 3, 2016

Anna Faris "Insecure" Over Chris Pratt Cheating Rumors


Anna Faris was a Terrible Babysitter

Anna Faris and Chris Pratt don"t think of themselves as a "Hollywood couple."

So, imagine their surprise when tabloids began to call their seven-year marriage into question. Faris spoke about how that made her feel while taping her Unqualified podcast with Isla Fisher.

"We grapple with the idea of being a public couple. For the first time, maybe a year ago or 10 months ago, we were in the public a little bit," Faris, 40, recalled. "There were some tabloid rumors about strain on our relationship. I just remember feeling so hurt in a way that bothered me because I didn"t want to think of myself as somebody that could be affected by tabloid s--t. There was a picture of me walking alone on the beach: "Aging Anna Faris, Alone on the Beach.""

In the past, Faris" personal life never received that kind of attention. "I take pride in how great my relationship is with Chris," she said. "But having said that, of course, in this crazy world where he"s off doing movies and I"m in L.A. raising our child, of course I"m going to feel vulnerable, like any normal human would. It did make me feel like, "Is public perceptioneven though it"s falseis there a grain of something?" It made me feel incredibly insecure."

Last year, Faris fought back after tabloids claimed her marriage was on the rocks. "I had always kind of believed that part of the rumors of celebrity couples were sort of true because they had never been part of my life," the Mom star told Us Weekly. "I was like, "Oh, maybe there"s a kernel of truth to that." It"s been a little devastating, because for us, it"s like, "What the heck?" This has been blindsiding to us. We have an incredible relationship. It"s been weirdly stinging."

Fisher sympathized with Faris as they recorded Unqualified. "It"s much more interesting to see a story about a tumultuous relationship than a happy one," said Fisher, who is fiercely protective of her relationship with Sacha Baron Cohen. If the rumors persist, Fisher joked, Faris and Pratt should "[release] a s*x tape" to quell any suspicions about their love.

Source: http://www.eonline.com/news/813254/anna-faris-insecure-over-chris-pratt-cheating-rumors

Continue Reading ..

Victoria"s Secret Accused of Cultural Appropriation Again


Hands To Myself/Me & My Girls - Medley (Live from the Victoria’s Secret 2015 Fashion Show)

Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty Images for Victoria"s Secret

Victoria"s Secret is in trouble again.

The lingerie giant has been accused of cultural appropriation during its annual fashion show. A writer from Cosmopolitan claims some of the outfits showcased during the extravaganza were racist. In an essay that since has been deleted, writer Helin Jung criticized the Asian and Mexican influences that inspired some of the Angels" luxurious looks and claimed the company held a condescending attitude toward its Asian customers.

"Stripping of cultures aside, the emblems that stood out most were the ones that came from Asiaspecifically China," she wrote.

Dominique Charriau/Getty Images for Victoria"s Secret

"The dragon that Elsa Hosk wore wrapped around her body, the embroidered stiletto boots seen on Adriana Lima, the tail made of flames worn by Kendall Jenner. There"s a lot of talk of China as a dominant world power of the 21st century, and the U.S. government, Hollywood, and now Victoria"s Secret, it seems, are pivoting to face a new reality. But the Orientalism on display here doesn"t show an understanding or an attempt at dialogue. It doesn"t close any gaps."

Jung continued, "The brand and its creative leads shamelessly cherry-picked imagery, breaking apart aesthetic references from wherever they wanted and stitching them back together again. They"re telling us its worldliness. It"s not, it"s a hack job."

E! News has reached out to Victoria"s Secret for comment.

Victoria"s Secret came under fire for cultural appropriation in 2012 when Karlie Kloss donned Native American-style headdresses. The company ended up pulling the footage from broadcast and apologized on Twitter. "We are sorry that the Native American headdress in our fashion show has upset individuals," the company tweeted at the time. "The outfit will be removed from the broadcast."

Kloss also apologized. "I am deeply sorry if what I wore during the VS Show offended anyone," she tweeted. "I support VS"s decision to remove the outfit from the broadcast."

Source: http://www.eonline.com/news/813233/victoria-s-secret-accused-of-cultural-appropriation-again

Continue Reading ..

Battle of the Fashion Parties, Paris: Victoria"s Secret vs. Pirelli Calendar


The Weeknd - Can’t Feel My Face (Live From The Victoria’s Secret 2015 Fashion Show)

Photo: Photos by Getty Images, collage by Biel Parklee.

While the art world was in Miami Beach at Art Basel, most of the fashion industry was in Paris this week at dueling mega-events. On Tuesday night, the Pirelli Calendar hosted a black tie gala in honor of photographer Peter Lindbergh"s calendar for 2017, which features un-retouched images of mostly makeup-less actresses like Nicole Kidman, Penelope Cruz, and Lupita N"yongo. The following night, Victoria"s Secret held their annual fashion show in the same city, along with a party to follow. This is how they each did Paris.

Location, location, locationPirelli: The Cit du Cinma, a hangarlike film studio located in Saint-Denis in the north of Paris. After a 40-minute drive from the city"s center, guests were dropped off in a parking lot to check in at a tent. Then, they were bussed to the film studio, which was decorated with enormous blow-ups of Peter Lindbergh"s calendar pictures.Victoria"s Secret: The Grand Palais in Paris. The epic venue is a mainstay for large-scale, over-the-top events, like the Chanel Fashion Show. For this occasion, there was Victoria"s Secret branding was everywhere. Three large signs hung from the facade, and a neon Victoria"s Secret sign sat in the center of the space. You did not show up to the wrong party.

SecurityPirelli: Three check points and cursory scan of your bag.Victoria"s Secret: More than 8. I lost count. Bags were opened and inspected at least three times. Despite the cold weather, guests also opened their jackets and walked through a metal detector. Government-issued photo ID was required. Again, you did not show up to the wrong party.

TribesPirelli: Hollywood actresses hobnobbed with Pirelli executives. Victoria"s Secret: Supermodels, former models, and an impressive turnout from the French fashion set.

X

At the 2016 Victoria"s Secret After Party, It Was All About the n***d Dress

The A-ListPirelli: Photographer Peter Lindbergh was joined by four actresses who appeared in the calendar: Nicole Kidman, Helen Mirren, Uma Thurman, and Charlotte Rampling. Victoria"s Secret: Gigi and Bella Hadid"s parents Yolanda and Mohamed Hadid sat front row next to Balmain designer Olivier Rousteing and models Veronica Webb, Lottie Moss, and Gabriel Kane-Day Lewis. Also in the front row: designer Azzedine Alaia, Givenchy"s Riccardo Tisci, editor Carine Roitfeld, Vogue Paris editor Emmanuelle Alt, former Victoria"s Secret angel Doutzen Kroes and TV personality Nick Cannon.

Pre-game of choicePirelli: A press conference with Peter Lindbergh at the Ritz, with a beautiful tea service.Victoria"s Secret: Three full days of festivities, kicking off with a private flight from New York, and followed by a series of photo ops.

Best sparkly dressPirelli: Nicole Kidman takes it in silver Armani Priv. Victoria"s Secret: It"s a toss up between Bella Hadid and Alessandra Ambrosio.

MusicPirelli: A lone DJ playing Euro-y EDM. He turned down all requests, even for Rihanna.Victoria"s Secret: While the fashion show included performances by the Weeknd, Lady Gaga, and Bruno Mars, the afterparty consisted of a DJ playing hits that were danceable but a bit past their prime (Kanye"s "Flashing Lights").

Drink of choicePirelli: Champagne, followed by lots of wine. Victoria"s Secret: A mysterious blue cocktail served to guests upon arrival.

X

Images From the 2017 Pirelli Calendar

SouvenirsPirelli: Every single guest left the Pirelli calendar gala with a calendar of dimensions nearly impossible to carry onto a plane. Victoria"s Secret: Photos and videos taken discretely on phones, to be released after the show ended. Is there any better takeaway than going viral?

After partyPirelli: Guests carrying the aforementioned calendars made their way to the bar at the Ritz perhaps a few left theirs behind.Victoria"s Secret: Ferdi Paris, home to the best burger in the city of lights. Gigi Hadid, Kendall Jenner, and Bella Hadid pre-ordered their cheeseburgers in advance.

Watch Victoria"s Secret Angel Jasmine Tookes try on the $3 million fantasy bra:

Source: http://www.wmagazine.com/story/battle-of-the-fashion-parties-paris-edition-victorias-secret-vs-pirelli-calendar

Continue Reading ..

Why People Believe Obama Encouraged �Illegals� to Vote


Cher - Believe [Official Music Video]
Photo: Pool/Getty Images

Yesterday, liberals found themselves aghast at a CNN segment that served as a tidy, outrageous case study in the perniciousness of conservative fake news. In the segment, host Alisyn Camerota discovers that a pair of Trump supporters she is interviewing, part of a small panel, are quite convinced President Obama effectively invited undocumented immigrants to vote, contributing to voter fraud that could have tilted the election results.

The segment kicks off with a Trump supporter named Paula righteously stating that voting is a privilege in this country, and you need to be here she enunciates to emphasize her outrage legal, not like California where three million illegals voted a claim that echoes unfounded statements made by the president-elect himself on Twitter a few days ago.

Lets talk about that, says Camerota, and it makes for an interesting segment thats worth transcribing almost in full:

Camerota: So where are you getting your information?

Paula: From the media! Where else would we get

Camerota: Which media?

Paula: Some of it was CNN, I believe.

Camerota [skeptical]: CNN said that three million illegal people voted in California ?

Paula: Well, it was coming all across the media all across. If CNN didnt do it, they were being smart this time.

Camerota [despairing internally]: Do you think that three million illegal people voted?

Paula: I believe in California that there were illegals that voted. || Camerota: How many?

Paula: I dont to tell you the truth, nobody really knows that number.

Camerota [wondering if law school is still an option since journalism is dead]: But, but, do you think three dozen, or do you think three million?

Camerota: I think there was a good amount, because the president told people that they could vote, and it happened in Nashua, we caught some people. That they went into Nashua and they said, The president said I could vote Im here illegally.

Camerota: Did you hear President Obama say that illegal people could vote?

At this point, both Paula and a woman sitting behind her say yes, they did. Paula asks where. Google it, you can find it on Facebook, says the woman in back. Camerota pulls out her phone, looks it up, and immediately finds out the claim was misleading, which she explains to the panel.

Then, the segment concludes:

Camerota: You, as you sit here today, think that millions of illegal people voted in this country. You believe that there was widespread voting abuse.

Paula: I think there was in some states.

Camerota: Millions of people?

Paula: California allows it.

Camerota [sputtering, her voice like that of a character in a Sartre novel]: They do not allow illegal you mean illeg you mean voter fraud, California allows?

Paula: I believe there is voter fraud in this country.

The segment reinforces several emerging points confirmation bias! about the hows and whys of our fake-news catastrophe:

1. Many low-information news consumers have an impressionistic view of news, dont know how to gauge the relative trustworthiness of different sources, and dont get too worked up about the specifics of claims. Paula jumps around to a remarkable extent. At first she is positive three million illegals voted in California. Then, she isnt quite sure that was the number, but she is sure it was a lot. She thinks she saw that on CNN, and when pressed says it was coming all across the media. What does she mean by the media? Her counterpart in the back makes that clear: Google it, you can find it on Facebook. The implication is clear: If a claim pops up on social media or a Google result, thats reason enough to take it seriously.

These women, like millions of Americans, lack basic media literacy. They likely dont understand that different media outlets have different politics, different editorial standards, and different agendas. CNN would be very unlikely to push a rumor as wild as the notion that three million undocumented immigrants voted last month. Eh, whatever: CNN, Google, Facebook same difference. And maybe there werent three million of them, and maybe most of them werent in California. Nashua! Yeah, I think I heard something about that. (A quick Google search on nashua illegal immigrants voting turns up nothing but incredulous coverage of Paulas claim, though maybe if you dig deeper there are results somewhere.) Also, in California they basically let just anyone vote.

The point here isnt to judge these women for not being media savvy plenty of people are just trying to get by in life, and might not have the opportunity to fully understand how media works. But if were going to fight fake news, we need to understand the extent to which some very basic, Communication Studies 101 norms simply arent held by a huge chunk of the population, leaving them extremely susceptible to misinformation at the hands of opportunists and radicals.

2. Hilariously low-quality, easily debunked content can go viral if it is connected to an outrage-inducing rumor. Googling reveals that one of the primary vectors of the Obama-said-illegals-can-vote rumors is this YouTube video of a segment on Fox Business:

Yes, that is someone recording their TV while breathing heavily, perhaps because they are so outraged by what they are seeing. As a comprehensive Hot Air rundown by Larry OConnor points out, Fox host Neil Cavutos editing of the source interview, in which Obama is speaking with actress and rapper Gina Rodriguez of the Latino/millennial Mitu network, leaves out a lot of context.

Heres OConnors transcript of their exchange, with a note from me in brackets:

RODRIGUEZ: Many of the millennials, Dreamers, undocumented citizens and I call them citizens because they contribute to this country are fearful of voting. So if I vote, will immigration know where I live? Will they come for my family and deport us?

OBAMA: Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself. And there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, et cetera. The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential [note: Cavutos show cuts things right here] in terms of who you voted for. If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote.

RODRIGUEZ: This has been a huge fear presented especially during this election.

OBAMA: And the reason that fear is promoted is because they dont want people voting. People are discouraged from voting and part of what is important for Latino citizens is to make your voice heard, because youre not just speaking for yourself. Youre speaking for family members, friends, classmates of yours in school

RODRIGUEZ: Your entire community.

OBAMA: who may not have a voice. Who cant legally vote. But theyre counting on you to make sure that you have the courage to make your voice heard.

Cavutos show snips things so viewers dont see that Obama specifically referred to the importance of Latino citizens making their voices heard, and specifically said that their friends and families may not have a voice because they cant legally vote.

Now, its still an awkward exchange in which the usually eloquent Obama comes across as a bit muddled (partly because, as OConnor points out, Rodriguezs phrasing of the question that kicks off the exchange is so vague), and if you interpret his words a certain way it does almost sound like hes encouraging illegal voting. But when you listen or read carefully, it cant logically be the case that Obama is both telling undocumented immigrants to vote and saying those same immigrants are counting on [citizens who can vote] to make sure that you have the courage to make your voice heard. When you hear the full exchange, rather than Cavutos selective cropping, youd have to, in effect, squint really hard to interpret this as Obama encouraging undocumented immigrants to vote.

No matter! It was snipped dishonestly, and the resulting video Obama seeming to throw open the gates to those millions of illegals, followed by Cavuto reacting in disbelief and disgust made for a clip so outrage-inducing to paranoid conservatives that many wing-nut honeypots, including Drudge, World Net Daily, Gateway Pundit, and others, disseminated that video with headlines screaming about Obamas insanely irresponsible behavior.

3. Theres an important snowball effect to fake news; peoples defenses seem to get beaten down over time by the broader rumor ecosystem. By the time the two women found themselves on camera for a CNN segment, they had apparently been exposed to a cavalcade of different iterations of the illegal-voters claim. For years, the GOP has been using the idea of voter fraud as a means of justifying voter suppression, despite a lack of any evidence of widespread voter fraud, and that has paved the way for an endless parade of misleading anecdotes, rumors, and viral content perpetuating this idea.

For example, to believe Obama would, during a recorded interview, call for undocumented immigrants to vote, youd have to believe pretty radical things about a guy who is, in fact, about as staid a center-left politician as they come. Youd have to, say, have been exposed to years and years of false news about him being an evil radical, about him maybe not even being American, about him wanting to undermine the entire American project.

The point is that fake news requires a whole ecosystem to work. If you just dropped that claim about Obama into an ecosystem in which Obama is viewed as a generic, normal president, itd be laughed off (the same goes, of course, for the idea of Hillary Clinton helping run a child-trafficking ring). But by the time voters immersed in these sorts of information ecosystems encounter a specific claim Trump making his wild accusation about three million voters, for example some cognitive trailblazing has already occurred. Each subsequent encounter with an iteration of the rumor seeps in a bit easier and will be likely harder to dislodge.

Source: http://nymag.com/selectall/2016/12/why-people-believe-obama-encouraged-illegals-to-vote.html

Continue Reading ..

Walter Scott Jr."s $53 million gift to alma mater, Colorado State, is largest in school"s history


Walter Scott Death: Video Shows Fatal North Charleston Police Shooting | The New York Times

Omaha businessman Walter Scott Jr. has donated $53.3 million to Colorado State University, the largest contribution in the schools history.

The money will go toward scholarships, faculty support and research, said the university, which will name its engineering college the Walter Scott Jr. College of Engineering.

Scott earned a bachelors degree in civil engineering from the college in 1953 and began his career at Peter Kiewit Sons Inc., becoming its chairman and CEO and now chairman emeritus.

As we get older, I think its natural to think about the generations that will follow, Scott, 85, said in a press release. And in a technological age, its important that our top students have the opportunity to study at strong research universities.

We are humbled and incredibly grateful for this remarkable gift from Walter Scott, Colorado State President Tony Frank said in the press release. Walter has been a passionate

and generous supporter of CSU since he graduated more than 60 years ago, and this gift is truly transformational.

Scott has donated more than $220 million to the University of Nebraska at Omaha, which recently named its south campus after him. His UNO support includes scholarships for 130 to 150 students per year and donations to establish the Peter Kiewit Institute, residence halls and other facilities.

At Colorado State, his money also helped build the newly completed Suzanne and Walter Scott Jr. Bioengineering Building and provide support for more than 30 faculty members and 120 graduate students who conduct research there into water, energy, health and environmental challenges.

The latest gift will expand Scotts scholarship program at Colorado State to as many as 80 undergraduates and 30 graduate students.

It will create presidential chair faculty positions in water, health, energy and the environment, the colleges four areas of excellence, with laboratories and other infrastructure to support teaching and research. The donation also provides discretionary funds for innovative and leadership programs.

Kiewit Corp.s office in Englewood, Colorado, employs more than 100 of the universitys alumni.

Engineering Dean David McLean said the gift will help the college attract top students and faculty members and become one of the best engineering programs in the country.

Source: http://www.omaha.com/news/metro/walter-scott-jr-s-million-gift-to-alma-mater-colorado/article_1a1cf63b-5cf8-5fda-9ac3-5c7084d98c71.html

Continue Reading ..